Assessing the impact of pollution on the Japaratuba river in Brazil using the Drosophila wing spot test
The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and sediment samples collected from Sites 1 and 2 on the Japaratuba River (Sergipe, Brazil), an area impacted by a petrochemical industrial complex that...
Saved in:
Published in | Environmental and molecular mutagenesis Vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 96 - 105 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.03.2007
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and sediment samples collected from Sites 1 and 2 on the Japaratuba River (Sergipe, Brazil), an area impacted by a petrochemical industrial complex that indirectly discharges treated effluent (produced water) into the river. The genotoxicity tests were performed in standard (ST) cross and high bioactivation (HB) cross flies and were conducted on samples taken in March (dry season) and in July (rainy season) of 2003. Mutant spot frequencies found in treatments with unprocessed water and sediment samples from the test sites were compared with the frequencies observed for similar samples taken from a clean reference site (the Jacarecica River in Sergipe, Brazil) and those of negative (ultrapure water) controls. While samples from the Japaratuba River generally produced greater responses than those from the Jacarecica River, positive responses were detected for both the test and reference site samples. All the water samples collected in March 2003 were genotoxic. In July 2003, the positive responses were restricted to water samples collected from Sites 1 B and 2 S in the ST cross. The genotoxicity of the water samples was due to mitotic recombination, and the samples produced similar genotoxic responses in ST and HB flies. The spot frequencies found in the July water samples were considerably lower than those for the March water samples, suggesting a seasonal effect. The only sediment samples that were genotoxic were from Site 1 (March and July) and from the Jacarecica River (March). The genotoxins in these samples produced both somatic mutation (limited to the Site 1 sample in HB flies) and recombination. The results of this study indicate that samples from both the Japaratuba and Jacarecica Rivers were genotoxic, with the most consistently positive responses detected with Site 1 samples, the site closest to the putative pollution source. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48:, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and sediment samples collected from Sites 1 and 2 on the Japaratuba River (Sergipe, Brazil), an area impacted by a petrochemical industrial complex that indirectly discharges treated effluent (produced water) into the river. The genotoxicity tests were performed in standard (ST) cross and high bioactivation (HB) cross flies and were conducted on samples taken in March (dry season) and in July (rainy season) of 2003. Mutant spot frequencies found in treatments with unprocessed water and sediment samples from the test sites were compared with the frequencies observed for similar samples taken from a clean reference site (the Jacarecica River in Sergipe, Brazil) and those of negative (ultrapure water) controls. While samples from the Japaratuba River generally produced greater responses than those from the Jacarecica River, positive responses were detected for both the test and reference site samples. All the water samples collected in March 2003 were genotoxic. In July 2003, the positive responses were restricted to water samples collected from Sites 1 B and 2 S in the ST cross. The genotoxicity of the water samples was due to mitotic recombination, and the samples produced similar genotoxic responses in ST and HB flies. The spot frequencies found in the July water samples were considerably lower than those for the March water samples, suggesting a seasonal effect. The only sediment samples that were genotoxic were from Site 1 (March and July) and from the Jacarecica River (March). The genotoxins in these samples produced both somatic mutation (limited to the Site 1 sample in HB flies) and recombination. The results of this study indicate that samples from both the Japaratuba and Jacarecica Rivers were genotoxic, with the most consistently positive responses detected with Site 1 samples, the site closest to the putative pollution source. Abstract The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and sediment samples collected from Sites 1 and 2 on the Japaratuba River (Sergipe, Brazil), an area impacted by a petrochemical industrial complex that indirectly discharges treated effluent (produced water) into the river. The genotoxicity tests were performed in standard (ST) cross and high bioactivation (HB) cross flies and were conducted on samples taken in March (dry season) and in July (rainy season) of 2003. Mutant spot frequencies found in treatments with unprocessed water and sediment samples from the test sites were compared with the frequencies observed for similar samples taken from a clean reference site (the Jacarecica River in Sergipe, Brazil) and those of negative (ultrapure water) controls. While samples from the Japaratuba River generally produced greater responses than those from the Jacarecica River, positive responses were detected for both the test and reference site samples. All the water samples collected in March 2003 were genotoxic. In July 2003, the positive responses were restricted to water samples collected from Sites 1 B and 2 S in the ST cross. The genotoxicity of the water samples was due to mitotic recombination, and the samples produced similar genotoxic responses in ST and HB flies. The spot frequencies found in the July water samples were considerably lower than those for the March water samples, suggesting a seasonal effect. The only sediment samples that were genotoxic were from Site 1 (March and July) and from the Jacarecica River (March). The genotoxins in these samples produced both somatic mutation (limited to the Site 1 sample in HB flies) and recombination. The results of this study indicate that samples from both the Japaratuba and Jacarecica Rivers were genotoxic, with the most consistently positive responses detected with Site 1 samples, the site closest to the putative pollution source. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48:, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and sediment samples collected from Sites 1 and 2 on the Japaratuba River (Sergipe, Brazil), an area impacted by a petrochemical industrial complex that indirectly discharges treated effluent (produced water) into the river. The genotoxicity tests were performed in standard (ST) cross and high bioactivation (HB) cross flies and were conducted on samples taken in March (dry season) and in July (rainy season) of 2003. Mutant spot frequencies found in treatments with unprocessed water and sediment samples from the test sites were compared with the frequencies observed for similar samples taken from a clean reference site (the Jacarecica River in Sergipe, Brazil) and those of negative (ultrapure water) controls. While samples from the Japaratuba River generally produced greater responses than those from the Jacarecica River, positive responses were detected for both the test and reference site samples. All the water samples collected in March 2003 were genotoxic. In July 2003, the positive responses were restricted to water samples collected from Sites 1 B and 2 S in the ST cross. The genotoxicity of the water samples was due to mitotic recombination, and the samples produced similar genotoxic responses in ST and HB flies. The spot frequencies found in the July water samples were considerably lower than those for the March water samples, suggesting a seasonal effect. The only sediment samples that were genotoxic were from Site 1 (March and July) and from the Jacarecica River (March). The genotoxins in these samples produced both somatic mutation (limited to the Site 1 sample in HB flies) and recombination. The results of this study indicate that samples from both the Japaratuba and Jacarecica Rivers were genotoxic, with the most consistently positive responses detected with Site 1 samples, the site closest to the putative pollution source. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48:, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
Author | Bueno Valadares, Bruno Lassmar Pavanin, Luiz Alfredo de Souza, Neila Coelho Alcântara, Ayda Vera Graf, Ulrich José Fragiorge, Edson Spanó, Mário Antoônio Rosa Guterres, Zaira da Hora Alves, José do Patrocínio Moraes Pantaleão, Silmara de de Rezende, Alexandre Azenha Alves |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Silmara de surname: Moraes Pantaleão fullname: Moraes Pantaleão, Silmara de organization: Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Estado de Sergipe, SE, Brazil – sequence: 2 givenname: Ayda Vera surname: Alcântara fullname: Alcântara, Ayda Vera organization: Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Estado de Sergipe, SE, Brazil – sequence: 3 givenname: José do Patrocínio surname: Hora Alves fullname: Hora Alves, José do Patrocínio organization: Laboratório de Química Analítica Ambiental, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Estado de Sergipe, SE, Brazil – sequence: 4 givenname: Luiz Alfredo surname: Pavanin fullname: Pavanin, Luiz Alfredo organization: Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil – sequence: 5 givenname: Ulrich surname: Graf fullname: Graf, Ulrich organization: Physiology and Animal Husbandry, Institute of Animal Sciences, ETH Zurich, CH-8603 Schwerzenbach, Switzerland – sequence: 6 givenname: Alexandre Azenha Alves surname: de Rezende fullname: de Rezende, Alexandre Azenha Alves organization: Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil – sequence: 7 givenname: Bruno Lassmar surname: Bueno Valadares fullname: Bueno Valadares, Bruno Lassmar organization: Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil – sequence: 8 givenname: Edson surname: José Fragiorge fullname: José Fragiorge, Edson organization: Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil – sequence: 9 givenname: Neila Coelho surname: de Souza fullname: de Souza, Neila Coelho organization: Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil – sequence: 10 givenname: Zaira da surname: Rosa Guterres fullname: Rosa Guterres, Zaira da organization: Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil – sequence: 11 givenname: Mário Antoônio surname: Spanó fullname: Spanó, Mário Antoônio email: maspano@ufu.br organization: Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais, MG, Brazil |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18554073$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17285639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqF0E1PFDEYB_DGYGRBEz-B6UXDZaAv89IeYUWQrHjRcGyedjtQ7UzHdkbAT0_XHeFkSJo0aX99_ul_D-30obcIvaXkkBLCjmx3yAgT9AVaUCJFwZggO2hBhORFXUu2i_ZS-kEIpaVkr9AubZioai4X6Po4JZuS66_xeGOx6wYwIw4tHoL30-hCj_PaXF3AABHGSQOO7reN2PX4JMIf5_H0-P5jDCkMN84Dvt2cpSGMeLRpfI1etuCTfTPv--j7p9Nvy_Ni9fXs8_J4VZiylLTgwFrGWl2Ckcw21tRGk0aXggCX1VpqYzNkVWW4EFV2GtaUylpr3RKmGd9HH7Zzhxh-TTlYdS4Z6z30NkxJMVJTTrh4FlIpqkrKMsODLTT5bynaVg3RdRDvFSVq076ynfrbfqbv5pmT7uz6Cc51Z_B-BpAM-DZCb1x6cjmyJA3Prti6W-ft_X8D1emXf8Gzd2m0d48e4k9VN7yp1NXlmSr51aq8uDxRS_4AYiar-A |
CODEN | EMMUEG |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2013_10_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpolbul_2017_12_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2009_10_034 crossref_primary_10_1590_S1415_47572008000400023 crossref_primary_10_1002_em_20404 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fct_2007_08_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2008_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mrgentox_2023_503638 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rsma_2022_102683 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S1383-5742(98)00008-8 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00360-0 10.1016/0141-1136(94)00143-D 10.1093/mutage/16.5.385 10.1093/genetics/87.4.685 10.1002/etc.5620170222 10.1016/0009-2797(85)90003-1 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90038-2 10.1016/0165-1218(93)90028-C 10.1016/0165-1161(90)90033-K 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.005 10.1002/em.10151 10.1002/em.20188 10.1155/S1110724302204052 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.034 10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00598-1 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00238-6 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90112-2 10.1258/0007142001902888 10.1016/0165-1161(95)90018-7 10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00586-4 10.1016/0165-1161(88)90019-2 10.1002/em.2860060206 10.1016/S0014-4800(03)00010-8 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90095-0 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)27:1<46::AID-EM7>3.0.CO;2-C 10.1002/em.20194 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00139-0 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.003 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00048-1 10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00064-9 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.002 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.004 10.1016/S1383-5718(00)00159-5 10.1016/0045-6535(89)90533-X 10.1016/0165-1161(92)90032-H 10.1016/S1383-5742(98)00002-7 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00031-X |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. 2007 INIST-CNRS (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. – notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS – notice: (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
DBID | BSCLL IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7SS 7TV 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7UA F1W H97 L.G |
DOI | 10.1002/em.20281 |
DatabaseName | Istex Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Pollution Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Engineering Research Database Pollution Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Water Resources Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Entomology Abstracts CrossRef MEDLINE Entomology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1098-2280 |
EndPage | 105 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_em_20281 17285639 18554073 EM20281 ark_67375_WNG_43WL4JNB_C |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | South America Brazil America Brazil, Sergipe |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Brazil – name: Brazil, Sergipe |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 A8Z AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAIKC AAMNW AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAVGM AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEFU ABEML ABHUG ABIJN ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADBTR ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AHBTC AI. AIACR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 DUUFO EBD EBS EDH EJD EMOBN ESTFP F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HBH HF~ HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWI RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TN5 UB1 V2E VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WWO WXI WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XV2 ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AITYG HGLYW OIG AAPBV IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7SS 7TV 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7UA F1W H97 L.G |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-3a2f22fb4ac92e7ec6cb07b480a395d9bcec44255c3885fb4bad1196bbbf02b23 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0893-6692 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 10:58:34 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 17 02:55:26 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 02:55:55 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:55:55 EDT 2024 Sun Oct 22 16:09:29 EDT 2023 Sat Aug 24 00:53:07 EDT 2024 Wed Jan 17 05:02:22 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Toxicity Mutagenicity testing Insecta Genotoxicity Rivers Sediments sediment Drosophilidae Pollution Toxicology Jacarecica river Arthropoda Genetics Invertebrata SMART Drosophila melanogaster River water Diptera |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4491-3a2f22fb4ac92e7ec6cb07b480a395d9bcec44255c3885fb4bad1196bbbf02b23 |
Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-43WL4JNB-C ArticleID:EM20281 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe istex:FA22DC1801A54F3E85F89BE423E5BA5B259A511A ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 17285639 |
PQID | 19855994 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_20613038 proquest_miscellaneous_19855994 crossref_primary_10_1002_em_20281 pubmed_primary_17285639 pascalfrancis_primary_18554073 wiley_primary_10_1002_em_20281_EM20281 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_43WL4JNB_C |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2007 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2007 text: March 2007 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Environmental and molecular mutagenesis |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Environ. Mol. Mutagen |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company Wiley-Liss |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company – name: Wiley-Liss |
References | Pitt JI. 2000. Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. Br Med Bull 56: 184-192. Watanabe T,Takahashi Y,Takahashi T,Nukaya H,Terao Y,Hirayama T,Wakabayashi K. 2002. Seasonal fluctuation of the mutagenicity of river water in Fukui, Japan, and the contribution of 2-phenylbenzotriazole-type mutagens. Mutat Res 519: 187-197. Bishop AJR,Schiestl RH. 2002. Homologous recombination and its role in carcinogenesis. J Biomed Biotechnol 2: 75-85. Graf U,Spanó MA,Rincón JG,Abraham SK,Andrade HH. 1996. The wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster. Afr Newslett Occup Health Saf 6( Suppl 1): 9-13. Bishop AJR,Schiestl RH. 2003. Role of homologous recombination in carcinogenesis. Exp Mol Pathol 74: 94-105. Strømgren T,Sørstrøm SE,Schou L,Kaarstad I,Aunaas T,Brakstad OG,Johansen Ø. 1995. Acute toxic effects of produced water in relation to chemical composition and dispersion. Mar Environ Res 40: 147-169. Vargas VMF,Motta VEP,Henriques JAP. 1993. Mutagenic activity detected by the Ames test in river water under the influence of petrochemical industries. Mutat Res 319: 31-45. Frei H,Würgler FE. 1995. Optimal experimental design and sample size for the statistical evaluation of data from somatic mutation and recombination tests (SMART) in Drosophila. Mutat Res 334: 247-258. Kastenbaum MA,Bowman KO. 1970. Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat Res 9: 527-549. Chen G,White PA. 2004. The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: A review. Mutat Res 567: 151-225. Graf U,Würgler FE,Katz AJ,Frei H,Juon H,Hall CB,Kale PG. 1984. Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Mutagen 6: 153-188. Claxton LD,Houk VS,Hughes TJ. 1998. Genotoxicity of industrial wastes and effluents. Mutat Res 410: 237-243. Woodall DW,Rabalais NN,Gambrell RP,DeLaune RD. 2003. Comparing methods and sediment contaminant indicators for determining produced water fate in a Louisiana estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 46: 731-740. Graf U,van Schaik N. 1992. Improved high bioactivation cross for the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 271: 59-67. Amaral VS,Silva RM,Reguly ML,Andrade HHR. 2005. Drosophila wing-spot test for genotoxic assessment of pollutants in water samples from urban and industrial origin. Mutat Res 583: 67-74. Frei H,Würgler FE. 1988. Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative or inconclusive result. Mutat Res 203: 297-308. Vargas VMF,Migliavacca SB,Melo AC,Horn RC,Guidobono RR,Ferreira ICFS,Pestana MHD. 2001. Genotoxicity assessment in aquatic environments under the influence of heavy metals and organic contaminants. Mutat Res 490: 141-158. Graf U,Singer D. 1989. Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster (wing spot test): Effects of extracts of airborne particulate matter from fire-exposed and non fire-exposed building ventilation filters. Chemosphere 19: 1094-1097. White PA,Rasmussen JB. 1998. The genotoxic hazards of domestic wastes in surface waters. Mutat Res 410: 223-236. Silva LP,Costa-Cruz JM,Spanó MA,Graf U. 2006. Genotoxicity of vesicular fluid and saline extract of Taenia solium metacestodes in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Mol Mutagen 47: 247-253. Graf U,Frei H,Kägi A,Katz AJ,Würgler FE. 1989. Thirty compounds tested in the Drosophila wing spot test. Mutat Res 222: 359-373. Ohe T,Watanabe T,Wakabayashi K. 2004. Mutagens in surface waters: A review. Mutat Res 567: 109-149. Hylland K. 2003. Book review: "Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: Effect of contaminants from oil well produced water" by Jerry M. Neff; Elsevier. 452 pp. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 287: 135-138. White PA,Rasmussen JB,Blaise C. 1998. Genotoxic substances in the St. Lawrence system. I. Industrial genotoxins sorbed to particulate matter in the St. Lawrence, St Maurice, and Saguenay rivers. Canada Environ Toxicol Chem 17: 286-303. Gray JS. 2002. Book review: "Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: Effect of contaminants from oil well produced water" by Jerry M. Neff; Elsevier. 452 pp. Mar Pollut Bull 44: 1435-1436. Sousa NC,Carvalho S,Spanó MA. 2003. Absence of genotoxicity of a phytotherapeutic extract from Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) Coville in somatic and germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Mol Mutagen 41: 293-299. Delgado-Rodriguez A,Ortíz-Martello R,Graf U,Villalobos-Pietrini R,Gómez-Arroyo S. 1995. Genotoxic activity of environmentally important polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their nitro derivatives in the wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 341: 235-247. Hällström I,Blanck A. 1985. Genetic regulation of the cytochrome P-450 system in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Chromosomal determination of some cytochrome P-450-dependent reactions. Chem Biol Interact 56: 157-171. Saner C,Weibel B,Würgler FE,Sengstag C. 1996. Metabolism of promutagens catalyzed by Drosophila melanogaster CYP6A2 enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Environ Mol Mutagen 27: 46-58. Spanó MA,Frei H,Würgler FE,Graf U. 2001. Recombinagenic activity of four compounds in the standard and high bioactivation crosses of Drosophila melanogaster in the wing spot test. Mutagen 16: 385-394. Amaral VS,Sinigaglia M,Reguly ML,Andrade HHR. 2006. Genetic toxicity in surface water from Guaíba Hydrographic Region under the influence of industrial, urban and agricultural sewage in the Drosophila wing-spot test. Environ Pollut 139: 469-476. Dapkus D,Merrell DJ. 1977. Chromosomal analysis of DDT-resistance in a long-term selected population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 87: 685-697. Delgado-Rodriguez A,Ortíz-Martello R,Villalobos-Pietrini R,Gómez-Arroyo S,Graf U. 1999. Genotoxicity of organic extracts of airborne particles in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Chemosphere 39: 33-43. Stephens SM,Frankling AC,Stagg RM,Brown JA. 2000. Sub-lethal effects of exposure of juvenile turbot to oil produced water. Mar Pollut Bull 40: 928-937. Alves JPH,Oliveira APC,Melo RPA. 2000. Metais pesados em sedimentos do rio Japaratuba, Vol 2. Cadernos UFS: Química e Meio Ambiente. pp 21-33. Frölich A,Würgler FE. 1990. Drosophila wing spot test: Improved detectability of genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Mutat Res 234: 71-80. Ding W-X,Shen H-M,Zhu H-G,Lee B-L,Ong C-N. 1999. Genotoxicity of microcystic cyanobacteria extract of a water source in China. Mutat Res 442: 69-77. Jha AN. 2004. Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: An overview. Mutat Res 552: 1-17. Scholten MCTh,Karman CC,Huwer S. 2000. Ecotoxicological risk assessment related to chemicals and pollutants in off-shore oil production. Toxicol Lett 112/113: 283-288. Pantaleão SM,Alcântara AV,Alves JPH,Spanó MA. 2006. The piscine micronucleus test to assess the impact of pollution on the Japaratuba river in Brazil. Environ Mol Mutagen 47: 219-224. 1970; 9 2004; 567 2000; 112/113 1998 2002; 2 1995 2000; 2 2005 1995; 334 1977; 87 1999; 442 1998; 410 2002; 519 2006; 139 2003; 74 1988; 203 2004; 552 1993; 319 1995; 40 1998; 17 1992; 271 2005; 583 1989; 222 2000; 56 2001; 490 1999; 39 1984; 6 2006; 47 2002; 44 2003; 46 2000; 40 2001; 16 1995; 341 1990; 234 1985; 56 1996; 27 2003; 41 1989; 19 2003; 287 1996; 6 e_1_2_1_42_1 e_1_2_1_20_1 e_1_2_1_41_1 e_1_2_1_40_1 e_1_2_1_24_1 e_1_2_1_44_1 e_1_2_1_22_1 e_1_2_1_43_1 e_1_2_1_27_1 e_1_2_1_28_1 e_1_2_1_25_1 e_1_2_1_26_1 e_1_2_1_29_1 e_1_2_1_7_1 e_1_2_1_31_1 e_1_2_1_8_1 e_1_2_1_30_1 e_1_2_1_5_1 e_1_2_1_6_1 Graf U (e_1_2_1_21_1) 1996; 6 e_1_2_1_3_1 e_1_2_1_12_1 e_1_2_1_35_1 e_1_2_1_4_1 e_1_2_1_13_1 e_1_2_1_34_1 Alves JPH (e_1_2_1_2_1) 2000 e_1_2_1_10_1 e_1_2_1_33_1 e_1_2_1_11_1 e_1_2_1_32_1 e_1_2_1_16_1 e_1_2_1_39_1 e_1_2_1_17_1 e_1_2_1_38_1 e_1_2_1_14_1 Guzmán‐Rincón J (e_1_2_1_23_1) 1995 e_1_2_1_37_1 e_1_2_1_15_1 e_1_2_1_36_1 e_1_2_1_9_1 e_1_2_1_18_1 e_1_2_1_19_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 234 start-page: 71 year: 1990 end-page: 80 article-title: Drosophila wing spot test: Improved detectability of genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 27 start-page: 46 year: 1996 end-page: 58 article-title: Metabolism of promutagens catalyzed by CYP6A2 enzyme in publication-title: Environ Mol Mutagen – volume: 44 start-page: 1435 year: 2002 end-page: 1436 article-title: Book review: “Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: Effect of contaminants from oil well produced water” by Jerry M. Neff; Elsevier. 452 pp publication-title: Mar Pollut Bull – year: 2005 – volume: 6 start-page: 9 issue: Suppl 1 year: 1996 end-page: 13 article-title: The wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in publication-title: Afr Newslett Occup Health Saf – volume: 287 start-page: 135 year: 2003 end-page: 138 article-title: Book review: “Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: Effect of contaminants from oil well produced water” by Jerry M. Neff; Elsevier publication-title: J Exp Marine Biol Ecol – volume: 410 start-page: 237 year: 1998 end-page: 243 article-title: Genotoxicity of industrial wastes and effluents publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 47 start-page: 247 year: 2006 end-page: 253 article-title: Genotoxicity of vesicular fluid and saline extract of metacestodes in somatic cells of publication-title: Environ Mol Mutagen – volume: 16 start-page: 385 year: 2001 end-page: 394 article-title: Recombinagenic activity of four compounds in the standard and high bioactivation crosses of in the wing spot test publication-title: Mutagen – volume: 56 start-page: 184 year: 2000 end-page: 192 article-title: Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins publication-title: Br Med Bull – volume: 567 start-page: 151 year: 2004 end-page: 225 article-title: The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: A review publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 74 start-page: 94 year: 2003 end-page: 105 article-title: Role of homologous recombination in carcinogenesis publication-title: Exp Mol Pathol – volume: 46 start-page: 731 year: 2003 end-page: 740 article-title: Comparing methods and sediment contaminant indicators for determining produced water fate in a Louisiana estuary publication-title: Mar Pollut Bull – volume: 2 start-page: 75 year: 2002 end-page: 85 article-title: Homologous recombination and its role in carcinogenesis publication-title: J Biomed Biotechnol – volume: 40 start-page: 147 year: 1995 end-page: 169 article-title: Acute toxic effects of produced water in relation to chemical composition and dispersion publication-title: Mar Environ Res – volume: 19 start-page: 1094 year: 1989 end-page: 1097 article-title: Somatic mutation and recombination test in (wing spot test): Effects of extracts of airborne particulate matter from fire‐exposed and non fire‐exposed building ventilation filters publication-title: Chemosphere – volume: 583 start-page: 67 year: 2005 end-page: 74 article-title: Drosophila wing‐spot test for genotoxic assessment of pollutants in water samples from urban and industrial origin publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 139 start-page: 469 year: 2006 end-page: 476 article-title: Genetic toxicity in surface water from Guaíba Hydrographic Region under the influence of industrial, urban and agricultural sewage in the Drosophila wing‐spot test publication-title: Environ Pollut – volume: 39 start-page: 33 year: 1999 end-page: 43 article-title: Genotoxicity of organic extracts of airborne particles in somatic cells of publication-title: Chemosphere – volume: 442 start-page: 69 year: 1999 end-page: 77 article-title: Genotoxicity of microcystic cyanobacteria extract of a water source in China publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 552 start-page: 1 year: 2004 end-page: 17 article-title: Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: An overview publication-title: Mutat Res – year: 1998 – volume: 41 start-page: 293 year: 2003 end-page: 299 article-title: Absence of genotoxicity of a phytotherapeutic extract from (Mart.) Coville in somatic and germ cells of publication-title: Environ Mol Mutagen – volume: 490 start-page: 141 year: 2001 end-page: 158 article-title: Genotoxicity assessment in aquatic environments under the influence of heavy metals and organic contaminants publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 40 start-page: 928 year: 2000 end-page: 937 article-title: Sub‐lethal effects of exposure of juvenile turbot to oil produced water publication-title: Mar Pollut Bull – volume: 334 start-page: 247 year: 1995 end-page: 258 article-title: Optimal experimental design and sample size for the statistical evaluation of data from somatic mutation and recombination tests (SMART) in Drosophila publication-title: Mutat Res – start-page: 169 year: 1995 end-page: 181 – volume: 567 start-page: 109 year: 2004 end-page: 149 article-title: Mutagens in surface waters: A review publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 410 start-page: 223 year: 1998 end-page: 236 article-title: The genotoxic hazards of domestic wastes in surface waters publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 341 start-page: 235 year: 1995 end-page: 247 article-title: Genotoxic activity of environmentally important polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their nitro derivatives in the wing spot test of publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 271 start-page: 59 year: 1992 end-page: 67 article-title: Improved high bioactivation cross for the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 9 start-page: 527 year: 1970 end-page: 549 article-title: Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 17 start-page: 286 year: 1998 end-page: 303 article-title: Genotoxic substances in the St. Lawrence system. I. Industrial genotoxins sorbed to particulate matter in the St. Lawrence, St Maurice, and Saguenay rivers publication-title: Canada Environ Toxicol Chem – volume: 87 start-page: 685 year: 1977 end-page: 697 article-title: Chromosomal analysis of DDT‐resistance in a long‐term selected population of publication-title: Genetics – volume: 112/113 start-page: 283 year: 2000 end-page: 288 article-title: Ecotoxicological risk assessment related to chemicals and pollutants in off‐shore oil production publication-title: Toxicol Lett – volume: 319 start-page: 31 year: 1993 end-page: 45 article-title: Mutagenic activity detected by the Ames test in river water under the influence of petrochemical industries publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 519 start-page: 187 year: 2002 end-page: 197 article-title: Seasonal fluctuation of the mutagenicity of river water in Fukui, Japan, and the contribution of 2‐phenylbenzotriazole‐type mutagens publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 222 start-page: 359 year: 1989 end-page: 373 article-title: Thirty compounds tested in the Drosophila wing spot test publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 6 start-page: 153 year: 1984 end-page: 188 article-title: Somatic mutation and recombination test in publication-title: Environ Mutagen – volume: 47 start-page: 219 year: 2006 end-page: 224 article-title: The piscine micronucleus test to assess the impact of pollution on the Japaratuba river in Brazil publication-title: Environ Mol Mutagen – volume: 2 start-page: 21 year: 2000 end-page: 33 – volume: 203 start-page: 297 year: 1988 end-page: 308 article-title: Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative or inconclusive result publication-title: Mutat Res – volume: 56 start-page: 157 year: 1985 end-page: 171 article-title: Genetic regulation of the cytochrome P‐450 system in . I. Chromosomal determination of some cytochrome P‐450‐dependent reactions publication-title: Chem Biol Interact – ident: e_1_2_1_8_1 doi: 10.1016/S1383-5742(98)00008-8 – ident: e_1_2_1_22_1 doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00360-0 – ident: e_1_2_1_38_1 doi: 10.1016/0141-1136(94)00143-D – ident: e_1_2_1_36_1 doi: 10.1093/mutage/16.5.385 – ident: e_1_2_1_10_1 doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.4.685 – ident: e_1_2_1_43_1 doi: 10.1002/etc.5620170222 – ident: e_1_2_1_24_1 doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(85)90003-1 – ident: e_1_2_1_27_1 doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90038-2 – ident: e_1_2_1_39_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(93)90028-C – ident: e_1_2_1_16_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(90)90033-K – ident: e_1_2_1_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.005 – ident: e_1_2_1_35_1 doi: 10.1002/em.10151 – volume: 6 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_1_21_1 article-title: The wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster publication-title: Afr Newslett Occup Health Saf contributor: fullname: Graf U – ident: e_1_2_1_29_1 doi: 10.1002/em.20188 – ident: e_1_2_1_5_1 doi: 10.1155/S1110724302204052 – ident: e_1_2_1_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.034 – ident: e_1_2_1_25_1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00598-1 – ident: e_1_2_1_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_33_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00238-6 – ident: e_1_2_1_20_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90112-2 – ident: e_1_2_1_30_1 doi: 10.1258/0007142001902888 – ident: e_1_2_1_15_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(95)90018-7 – ident: e_1_2_1_12_1 doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00586-4 – ident: e_1_2_1_14_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(88)90019-2 – ident: e_1_2_1_19_1 doi: 10.1002/em.2860060206 – ident: e_1_2_1_6_1 doi: 10.1016/S0014-4800(03)00010-8 – ident: e_1_2_1_11_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90095-0 – ident: e_1_2_1_32_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1996)27:1<46::AID-EM7>3.0.CO;2-C – ident: e_1_2_1_34_1 doi: 10.1002/em.20194 – ident: e_1_2_1_41_1 doi: 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00139-0 – ident: e_1_2_1_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.003 – ident: e_1_2_1_44_1 doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00048-1 – ident: e_1_2_1_13_1 doi: 10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00064-9 – ident: e_1_2_1_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.002 – ident: e_1_2_1_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.004 – ident: e_1_2_1_40_1 doi: 10.1016/S1383-5718(00)00159-5 – ident: e_1_2_1_17_1 doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(89)90533-X – ident: e_1_2_1_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_1_18_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(92)90032-H – ident: e_1_2_1_42_1 doi: 10.1016/S1383-5742(98)00002-7 – start-page: 21 volume-title: Metais pesados em sedimentos do rio Japaratuba year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_1_2_1 contributor: fullname: Alves JPH – start-page: 169 volume-title: Biomonitors and Biomarkers as Indicators of Environmental Change year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_1_23_1 contributor: fullname: Guzmán‐Rincón J – ident: e_1_2_1_37_1 doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00031-X |
SSID | ssj0011492 |
Score | 1.8920572 |
Snippet | The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and... Abstract The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed pascalfrancis wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 96 |
SubjectTerms | Animals Biological and medical sciences Brazil Drosophila - anatomy & histology Drosophila - drug effects Drosophila melanogaster Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Pollution - adverse effects Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution genotoxicity Jacarecica river Medical sciences Mutagenicity Tests Mutagens - toxicity river water Rivers - chemistry sediment SMART Toxicology Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology Wings, Animal - drug effects |
Title | Assessing the impact of pollution on the Japaratuba river in Brazil using the Drosophila wing spot test |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-43WL4JNB-C/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fem.20281 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17285639 https://search.proquest.com/docview/19855994 https://search.proquest.com/docview/20613038 |
Volume | 48 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYlpdBL3w_3kapQenNiy_Lr2KRJw9LsoTQk0IMYyVJYknqD16Ztfn1npPUuWxooBYPBHhtLo_F8kma-Yeyds0WWQJ7EutFlLJ2VsaYwMdR1Ca5ITeVJfY6nxdGJnJzlZ8uoSsqFCfwQqwU3sgz_vyYDB73YXZOGWsojFz7rmnj0CA99WTFHIcr39ZATdMdxUdRi5J1NxO744IYnuk2d-pMiI2GBneNCVYu_wc5NFOvd0OF99m1sQIg-udgZer1jrv_gdvy_Fj5g95bolH8Iw-khu2XbR-xOqFf56zE7D1vE6O044kYeMiz53PErKphMKuZ40K0JeE7xQQPvKPKDz1q-18H17JIPq-c_dr6IwuwS-A-6hjPsniP07Z-wk8ODr_tH8bJSQ2ykrNM4A-GEcFqCqYUtrSmMTkotqwSyOm9qbSwK4uzFZFWVo5yGJkXb11q7RGiRPWVb7by1zxk3TeMQ0khLKbtppmtnAUrErQApOlsdsbej1tRVIORQgXpZKPtd-Q6L2HuvzpUAdBcUwFbm6nT6Scns9LOcTPfUfsS2N_S9fiNF7-HfL2JvxgGg0O5oMwVaOx8WKq0rImuTN0sIgkpJVkXsWRg567eXosoRGuJ3ev3f2BB1cOzPL_5V8CW7GxafKUjuFdvqu8G-RtTU621vH78B9kESow |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,1382,27957,27958,46329,46753 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB5CQmkvfT-ctokKpTcntiy_6KlJk263u3soCcmhICRbKkuS3eDYtM2v74wU77KlgVIwGOyxsTQazydp5huAt9ZkSaTSKNS1zkNhjQg1hYmhrnNls7gqHKnPeJINjsXwND1dg_d9Loznh1gsuJFluP81GTgtSO8uWUMNJZJzSrveQGtP3Xzq64I7CnG-q4gcoUMOs6zkPfNsxHf7J1d80QZ160-KjVRX2D3W17X4G_BcxbHOER0-gG99E3z8ydlO1-qd6voPdsf_bONDuH8DUNkHP6IewZqZPYY7vmTlryfw3e8So8NjCB2ZT7Jkc8suqWYyaZnhQbeGytGKd1qxhoI_2HTG9hp1PT1n3eL5j42rozA9V-wHXcNJdssQ_bZP4fjw4Gh_EN4UawgrIco4TBS3nFstVFVyk5sqq3SUa1FEKinTutSVQUGcwFRJUaQop1Udo_lrrW3ENU-ewfpsPjMvgFV1bRHVCENZu3GiS2uUyhG6KhWjv9UBvOnVJi89J4f07MtcmgvpOiyAd06fCwHVnFEMW57Kk8knKZKTkRhO9uR-AFsrCl--kQL48AcYwHY_AiSaHu2nqJmZd1cyLgviaxO3S3BCS1FSBPDcD53l23NepIgO8TvdALi1IfJg7M6b_yq4DXcHR-ORHH2efHkJ9_xaNMXMvYL1tunMawRRrd5yxvIbIGYWxQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEF-kRfFFrR81atsVxLe0ye7m67Ht9axne4hYWvBh2U125WjNHWmC2r--M7uXO04siBAIJJOQ3dnJ_HZ35jeEvLMm5ZFKolBXOguFNSLUGCYGus6UTeMyd6Q-p-P0-EyMLpKLeVQl5sJ4fojFghtahvtfo4HPKru3JA01mEfOMOt6XaSc4YgefFlQRwHMdwWRI_DHYZoWrCeejdhe_-SKK1rHXv2FoZHqGnrH-rIWf8OdqzDW-aHhY_Ktb4EPP7nc7Vq9W978Qe74f018Qh7N4Snd9-Npg9wz9VNy3xes_P2MfPd7xODuKABH6lMs6dTSGVZMRh1TOPDWSDlS8U4r2mDoB53U9KBRN5Mr2i2eHzSuisLkStGfeA2m2C0F7Ns-J2fDo6-Hx-G8VENYClHEIVfMMma1UGXBTGbKtNRRpkUeKV4kVaFLA4IwfSl5nicgp1UVg_FrrW3ENOMvyFo9rc1LQsuqsoBphMGc3ZjrwhqlMgCuSsXgbXVA3vZakzPPyCE99zKT5od0HRaQ906dCwHVXGIEW5bI8_EHKfj5iRiND-RhQLZX9L18I4bvwe8vIDv9AJBgeLibomoz7a5lXOTI1ibulmCIlSKeB2TTj5zl2zOWJ4AN4Tud_u9siDw6dedX_yq4Qx58Hgzlycfxp9fkoV-IxoC5N2StbTqzBQiq1dvOVG4B0QcVdA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+the+impact+of+pollution+on+the+Japaratuba+river+in+Brazil+using+the+Drosophila+wing+spot+test&rft.jtitle=Environmental+and+molecular+mutagenesis&rft.au=Moraes+Pantale%C3%A3o%2C+Silmara+de&rft.au=Alc%C3%A2ntara%2C+Ayda+Vera&rft.au=Hora+Alves%2C+Jos%C3%A9+do+Patroc%C3%ADnio&rft.au=Pavanin%2C+Luiz+Alfredo&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc.%2C+A+Wiley+Company&rft.issn=0893-6692&rft.eissn=1098-2280&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=105&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fem.20281&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_43WL4JNB_C |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0893-6692&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0893-6692&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0893-6692&client=summon |