Assessing the impact of pollution on the Japaratuba river in Brazil using the Drosophila wing spot test

• Published in: Environmental and molecular mutagenesis Vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 96 - 105
• Main Authors: Moraes Pantaleão, Silmara de, Alcântara, Ayda Vera, Hora Alves, José do Patrocínio, Pavanin, Luiz Alfredo, Graf, Ulrich, de Rezende, Alexandre Azenha Alves, Bueno Valadares, Bruno Lassmar, José Fragiorge, Edson, de Souza, Neila Coelho, Rosa Guterres, Zaira da, Spanó, Mário Antoônio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.03.2007; Wiley-Liss
• Subjects: Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Brazil; Drosophila - anatomy & histology; Drosophila - drug effects; Drosophila melanogaster; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Environmental Pollution - adverse effects; Freshwater; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution; genotoxicity; Jacarecica river; Medical sciences; Mutagenicity Tests; Mutagens - toxicity; river water; Rivers - chemistry; sediment; SMART; Toxicology; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity; Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology; Wings, Animal - drug effects; South America; Brazil; America; Brazil, Sergipe; Toxicity; Mutagenicity testing; Insecta; Genotoxicity; Rivers; Sediments; sediment; Drosophilidae; Pollution; Toxicology; Jacarecica river; Arthropoda; Genetics; Invertebrata; SMART; Drosophila melanogaster; River water; Diptera
• ISSN: 0893-6692; 1098-2280
• DOI: 10.1002/em.20281

The Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was used to assess the genotoxicity of surface (S) and bottom (B) water and sediment samples collected from Sites 1 and 2 on the Japaratuba River (Sergipe, Brazil), an area impacted by a petrochemical industrial complex that indirectly discharges treated effluent (produced water) into the river. The genotoxicity tests were performed in standard (ST) cross and high bioactivation (HB) cross flies and were conducted on samples taken in March (dry season) and in July (rainy season) of 2003. Mutant spot frequencies found in treatments with unprocessed water and sediment samples from the test sites were compared with the frequencies observed for similar samples taken from a clean reference site (the Jacarecica River in Sergipe, Brazil) and those of negative (ultrapure water) controls. While samples from the Japaratuba River generally produced greater responses than those from the Jacarecica River, positive responses were detected for both the test and reference site samples. All the water samples collected in March 2003 were genotoxic. In July 2003, the positive responses were restricted to water samples collected from Sites 1 B and 2 S in the ST cross. The genotoxicity of the water samples was due to mitotic recombination, and the samples produced similar genotoxic responses in ST and HB flies. The spot frequencies found in the July water samples were considerably lower than those for the March water samples, suggesting a seasonal effect. The only sediment samples that were genotoxic were from Site 1 (March and July) and from the Jacarecica River (March). The genotoxins in these samples produced both somatic mutation (limited to the Site 1 sample in HB flies) and recombination. The results of this study indicate that samples from both the Japaratuba and Jacarecica Rivers were genotoxic, with the most consistently positive responses detected with Site 1 samples, the site closest to the putative pollution source. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48:, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.