An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate mechanical and esthetic Properties of two commercially available orthodontic sealants: Opal ® Seal (OS) and L.E.D. Pro Seal (PS). Materials and Methods: Discs of each sealant were prepared to test the following properties: Micro hardness, wear resistance and color sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of dentistry Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 487 - 492
Main Authors Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela, Rohani, Nima, Covey, David, Premaraj, Sundaralingam, Hua, Yi, Watanabe, Hidehiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 01.10.2014
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate mechanical and esthetic Properties of two commercially available orthodontic sealants: Opal ® Seal (OS) and L.E.D. Pro Seal (PS). Materials and Methods: Discs of each sealant were prepared to test the following properties: Micro hardness, wear resistance and color stability. Samples were randomly selected after the wear test for SEM imaging to analyze surface morphology. Results: OS was significantly harder than PS ( P < 0.001). PS was significantly more wear resistant than OS ( P < 0.05). PS showed a greater ΔE*ab (increased staining) when placed in wine or coffee showing a significant difference ( P < 0.05). SEM showed particle size, shape and distribution were different for PS and OS reflecting the pattern seen on wear surfaces. Conclusion: Both orthodontic sealants are beneficial for protecting enamel. However with better wear properties PS was superior in resisting mechanical stresses. OS was more color stable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1305-7456
1305-7464
DOI:10.4103/1305-7456.143630