Increased Propensity for Central Apnea in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

There is increasing evidence of increased ventilatory instability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but previous investigations have not studied whether the hypocapnic apneic threshold is altered in this group. To compare the apneic threshold, CO2 reserve, and controller gain between s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 181; no. 2; pp. 189 - 193
Main Authors Salloum, Anan, Rowley, James A, Mateika, Jason H, Chowdhuri, Susmita, Omran, Qasim, Badr, M. Safwan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Am Thoracic Soc 15.01.2010
American Thoracic Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is increasing evidence of increased ventilatory instability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but previous investigations have not studied whether the hypocapnic apneic threshold is altered in this group. To compare the apneic threshold, CO2 reserve, and controller gain between subjects with and without OSA matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Hypocapnia was induced via nasal mechanical ventilation for 3 minutes. Cessation of mechanical ventilation resulted in hypocapnic central hypopnea or apnea depending upon the magnitude of the hypocapnia. The apnea threshold (Pet(CO2)-AT) was defined as the measured Pet(CO2) at which the apnea closest to the last hypopnea occurred. The CO2 reserve was defined as the change in Pet(CO2) between eupneic Pet(CO2) and Pet(CO2)-AT. Controller gain was defined as the ratio of change in Ve between control and hypopnea or apnea to the DeltaPet(CO2). Eleven pairs of subjects were studied. There was no difference in the Pet(CO2)-AT between the two groups. However, the CO2 reserve was smaller in the subjects with OSA (2.2 +/- 0.6 mm Hg) compared with the control subjects (4.5 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; P < 0.001). The controller gain was increased in the subjects with OSA (3.7 +/- 1.3 L/min/mm Hg) compared with the control subjects (1.6 +/- 0.5 L/min/mm Hg; P < 0.001). Controller gain decreased and CO2 reserve increased in seven subjects restudied after using continuous positive airway pressure for 1 month. Ventilatory instability is increased in subjects with OSA and is reversible with the use of continuous positive airway pressure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.
This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org
Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200810-1658OC on September 17, 2009
Supported by VA Merit Award, National Institutes of Health K24 and by NIH R01-HL053443.
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.200810-1658OC