Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor

The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultrasonography is more accurate than vaginal examination in the determination of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor. Eighty-eight patients in the second stage of labor were evaluated by vaginal examination and by combined transabdo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 191; no. 2; pp. 521 - 524
Main Authors Chou, Margaret R., Kreiser, Doron, Taslimi, M.Mark, Druzin, Maurice L., El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Mosby, Inc 01.08.2004
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultrasonography is more accurate than vaginal examination in the determination of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor. Eighty-eight patients in the second stage of labor were evaluated by vaginal examination and by combined transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examination to determine occiput position. These predictions of position were compared with the actual delivery position at vaginal delivery after spontaneous restitution or at cesarean delivery. Different examiners performed the vaginal examinations and the ultrasound examinations. Each examiner was blinded to the determination of the other examiner. Vaginal examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 71.6% of the time; ultrasound examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 92.0% of the time (P=.018). Ultrasound examination is more accurate than vaginal examination in the diagnosis of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.029