Comparison of target enrichment strategies for ancient pathogen DNA
In ancient DNA research, the degraded nature of the samples generally results in poor yields of highly fragmented DNA; targeted DNA enrichment is thus required to maximize research outcomes. The three commonly used methods – array-based hybridization capture and in-solution capture using either RNA...
Saved in:
Published in | BioTechniques Vol. 69; no. 6; pp. 455 - 459 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Future Science Ltd
01.12.2020
Taylor & Francis Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In ancient DNA research, the degraded nature of the samples generally results in poor yields of highly fragmented DNA; targeted DNA enrichment is thus required to maximize research outcomes. The three commonly used methods – array-based hybridization capture and in-solution capture using either RNA or DNA baits – have different characteristics that may influence the capture efficiency, specificity and reproducibility. Here we compare their performance in enriching pathogen DNA of
and
from 11 ancient and 19 modern samples. We find that in-solution approaches are the most effective method in ancient and modern samples of both pathogens and that RNA baits usually perform better than DNA baits.
We compared three targeted DNA enrichment strategies used in ancient DNA research for the specific enrichment of pathogen DNA regarding their efficiency, specificity and reproducibility for ancient and modern
and
samples. The three methods – array-based capture and in-solution capture with RNA and DNA baits – were all tested in three independent replicates. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0736-6205 1940-9818 |
DOI: | 10.2144/btn-2020-0100 |