On metaphoric representation

The article discusses claims that conceptual structure is in some part metaphorical, as identified by verbal metaphors like LOVE IS A JOURNEY. Two main interpretations of this view are discussed. In the first, a target domain is not explicitly represented but is instead understood through reference...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognition Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 173 - 204
Main Author Murphy, Gregory L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.08.1996
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Cognition
Communication disorders
Concept Formation
Humans
Metaphor
Problem Solving
Psycholinguistics
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The article discusses claims that conceptual structure is in some part metaphorical, as identified by verbal metaphors like LOVE IS A JOURNEY. Two main interpretations of this view are discussed. In the first, a target domain is not explicitly represented but is instead understood through reference to a different domain. For example, rather than a detailed concept of love per se, one could make reference to the concept of a journey. In the second interpretation, there is a separate representation of love, but the content of that representation is influenced by the metaphor such that the love concept takes on the same structure as the journey concept. It is argued that the first interpretation is not fully coherent. The second interpretation is a possible theory of mental representation, but the article raises a number of empirical and theoretical problems for it. It is concluded that many of the data cited as evidence for metaphoric representations can be accounted for by structural similarity between domains.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0010-0277
1873-7838
DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1