Accounting for failures may improve precision: evidence supporting improved validity of self-reported condom use

To determine whether a measure of unprotected vaginal sex that is adjusted for condom failures would produce improved accuracy in predicting biologically confirmed STDs (chlamydia and gonorrhea) among female teens. Self-reported measures were collected using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSexually transmitted diseases Vol. 32; no. 8; p. 513
Main Authors Crosby, Richard, Salazar, Laura F, DiClemente, Ralph J, Yarber, William L, Caliendo, Angela M, Staples-Horne, Michelle
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.08.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine whether a measure of unprotected vaginal sex that is adjusted for condom failures would produce improved accuracy in predicting biologically confirmed STDs (chlamydia and gonorrhea) among female teens. Self-reported measures were collected using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing. DNA amplification for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was conducted. The unadjusted measure of unprotected vaginal sex was not significantly associated with biologically confirmed prevalence of STDs (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.71-3.21; P = 0.28). Alternatively, the adjusted measure achieved significance (PR = 3.59; 95% CI = 1.13-11.38; P = 0.014). More than one quarter (25.6%) of teens using condoms inconsistently and/or incorrectly tested positive for an STD compared to 7.1% among those reporting the consistent and correct use of condoms. Findings demonstrate that studies of condom effectiveness should use an adjusted measure of condom use to achieve precision and rigor.
ISSN:0148-5717
DOI:10.1097/01.olq.0000170442.10150.28