Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the stability of combined Le Fort I maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement performed for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion. Twenty-nine patients, mean age 22.6 years, underwent bimaxillary surgery with rigid internal fi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 33; no. 7; pp. 656 - 663
Main Authors Arpornmaeklong, P., Shand, J.M., Heggie, A.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2004
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the stability of combined Le Fort I maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement performed for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion. Twenty-nine patients, mean age 22.6 years, underwent bimaxillary surgery with rigid internal fixation. Standardised cephalometric analyses were performed using serial lateral cephalometric radiographs. The post-surgical follow-up was a minimum of 12 months, with a mean of 25.2 months. The maxilla was impacted by a mean of 4.3±3.3 mm, and horizontally advanced by a mean of 2.6±2.3 mm. The results demonstrated that the maxilla tended to move anteriorly and inferiorly but this was not significant in either horizontal or vertical planes ( P>0.05). The mean advancement of the mandible, at menton, was 10.7±5.6 mm, and in 14 cases (48.2%) menton was advanced greater than 10 mm. In 34.7% of the patients the mandible underwent posterior movement between 2 and 4 mm. In the vertical plane, gonion moved superiorly by a mean of 2.7±3.6 mm which was significant. Significant mandibular relapse was found to have occurred in five female patients, with high mandibular plane angles who had undergone large advancements of greater than 10 mm. In conclusion, the majority of patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusions maintained a stable result. However, a small number of patients, exhibiting similar characteristics, suffered significant skeletal relapse in the mandible secondary to condylar remodelling and/or resorption.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0901-5027
1399-0020
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2004.01.004