A Phase I, Open-label, Randomized, 2-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal and Oral Varenicline

To estimate the systemic bioavailability of OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray, an investigational treatment for dry eye disease, relative to oral varenicline approved for smoking cessation. The Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of Varenicline Administered as OC-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical therapeutics Vol. 43; no. 9; pp. 1595 - 1607
Main Authors Nau, Jeffrey, Wyatt, David J., Rollema, Hans, Crean, Christopher S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2021
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To estimate the systemic bioavailability of OC-01 (varenicline) nasal spray, an investigational treatment for dry eye disease, relative to oral varenicline approved for smoking cessation. The Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of Varenicline Administered as OC-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spray as Compared to Varenicline Administered Orally as Chantix (ZEN study) was a Phase I, open-label, randomized, single-center, 2-way crossover study. On day 1, 22 healthy participants were randomized 1:1 to a single intranasal dose of varenicline 0.12 mg in OC-01 nasal spray or a single oral dose of varenicline 1 mg. On day 15, all participants crossed over to receive a single dose of the alternate treatment. Plasma samples were collected for 6 days after each dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. Tolerability was monitored throughout. After a single dose of intranasal varenicline 0.12 mg in OC-01 nasal spray, peak systemic exposure (mean plasma Cmax) was 0.34 ng/mL, which occurred at a median Tmax of 2.0 hours. In comparison, mean plasma Cmax after oral varenicline 1 mg was 4.63 ng/mL at a median Tmax of 3.0 hours. On the basis of geometric mean ratio point estimates, peak exposure (Cmax) and total exposure (AUC0–∞) after intranasal varenicline 0.12 mg were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively, of the systemic exposure associated with oral varenicline 1 mg. Dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0–∞ for intranasal varenicline remained 39% and 33% lower versus oral varenicline, respectively. No new or unexpected tolerability signals were detected. At its highest intended single dose in OC-01 nasal spray, intranasal varenicline delivered less drug to the systemic circulation than oral varenicline at its highest approved single dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04072146.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0149-2918
1879-114X
DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.07.020