Angiotensin Receptor Blocker is Associated with a Lower Fracture Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: International journal of clinical practice (Esher) Vol. 2022; pp. 1 - 9
• Main Authors: Wu, Jing, Wang, Mei, Guo, Man, Du, Xin-Yi, Tan, Xiao-Zhen, Teng, Fang-Yuan, Xu, Yong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Hindawi 2022; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Age; Angiotensin; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - adverse effects; Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Cardiovascular diseases; Cohort analysis; Comorbidity; Diabetes; Drug dosages; Enzymes; Ethnicity; Fractures; Gender; Hip; Hip Fractures; Hip joint; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertension - complications; Hypertension - drug therapy; Male; Meta-analysis; Osteoporosis; Peptidyl-dipeptidase A; Prospective Studies; Review; United States > US
• ISSN: 1368-5031; 1742-1241; 1742-1241
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/7581110

Background. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in the treatment of hypertension. Hypertension is often accompanied by osteoporosis. However, the relationship between ACEI/ARB and fractures remains controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to update the potential relationship between ACEI/ARB and fractures. Methods. This meta-analysis was identified through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Related studies about ACEI/ARB with the risk of fracture were published from inception to June 2022. Results. Nine qualified prospective designed studies, involving 3,649,785 subjects, were included in this analysis. Overall, the RRs of ACEI compared with the nonusers were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88, 1.10; P<0.001) for composite fractures and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.05; P=0.048) for hip fractures; the RRs of ARB compared to the nonusers were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.91; P<0.001) for composite fractures and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.97; P=0.028) for hip fractures. Furthermore, in the subgroup analysis, male may benefit from ARB (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.89, P=0.028), and the European may also benefit from ARB (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80, 0.93, P=0.015). Conclusions. ACEI usage will not decrease the risk of osteoporosis fracture. On the contrary, ARB usage can decrease the risk of total fracture and hip fracture, especially for males and Europeans. Compared with ACEI, for patients at higher risk of fracture in cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, the protective effect of ARB should be considered.