Climate change shifts forward flowering and reduces crop waterlogging stress

• Published in: Environmental research letters Vol. 16; no. 9; pp. 94017 - 94031
• Main Authors: Liu, Ke, Harrison, Matthew Tom, Archontoulis, Sotirios V, Huth, Neil, Yang, Rui, Liu, De Li, Yan, Haoliang, Meinke, Holger, Huber, Isaiah, Feng, Puyu, Ibrahim, Ahmed, Zhang, Yunbo, Tian, Xiaohai, Zhou, Meixue
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bristol IOP Publishing 01.09.2021
• Subjects: Adaptation; Agricultural production; breeding; Climate; Climate change; Crop growth; Crop yield; Crops; environmental characterisation; extreme climatic events; Farms; Flowering; Genotypes; Heat resistance; High temperature; Historic buildings & sites; Historic sites; Planting; Rainfall; Reduction; Soil stresses; Stress; Sustainability; tolerance; Waterlogged ground; Waterlogging
• ISSN: 1748-9326; 1748-9326
• DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1b5a

Abstract Climate change will drive increased frequencies of extreme climatic events. Despite this, there is little scholarly information on the extent to which waterlogging caused by extreme rainfall events will impact on crop physiological behaviour. To improve the ability to reliably model crop growth and development under soil waterlogging stress, we advanced the process-basis of waterlogging in the farming systems model Agricultural Systems Production Systems sIMulator. Our new mathematical description of waterlogging adequately represented waterlogging stress effects on the development, biomass and grain yield of many commercial Australian barley genotypes. We then used the improved model to examine how optimal flowering periods (OFPs, the point at which long-term abiotic stresses are minimal) change under historical and future climates in waterlogging-prone environments, and found that climate change will reduce waterlogging stress and shift forward OFP (26 d earlier on average across locations). For the emissions scenario representative concentration pathway 8.5 at 2090, waterlogging stresses diminished but this was not enough to prevent substantial yield reduction due to increasingly severe high temperature stress (−35% average reduction in yield across locations, genotypes and sowing dates). It was shown that seasonal waterlogging stress patterns under future conditions will be similar to those occurring historically. Yield reduction caused by waterlogging stress was 6% and 4% on average across sites under historical and future climates. To adapt, both genotypic and management adaptations will be required: earlier sowing and planting waterlogging tolerant genotypes mitigate yield penalty caused by waterlogging by up to 26% and 24% under historical and future climates. We conclude that even though the prevalence of waterlogging in future will diminish, climate change and extreme climatic events will have substantial and perverse effects on the productivity and sustainability of Australian farms.