Outcomes for intermediate risk prostate cancer: Are there advantages for surgery, external radiation, or brachytherapy?

Abstract The treatment of localized prostate cancer remains controversial because of the lack of conclusive well-controlled or randomized studies comparing outcome of various forms of radiotherapy (RT) to radical prostatectomy (RP). We review recent results from an institutional database and prospec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrologic oncology Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 67 - 71
Main Authors Klein, Eric A., M.D, Ciezki, Jay, M.D, Kupelian, Patrick A., M.D, Mahadevan, Arul, M.D
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The treatment of localized prostate cancer remains controversial because of the lack of conclusive well-controlled or randomized studies comparing outcome of various forms of radiotherapy (RT) to radical prostatectomy (RP). We review recent results from an institutional database and prospective quality of life study comparing cancer-related and quality of live (QOL) outcomes among different treatment modalities for intermediate risk prostate cancer. The results suggest similar short-term survival but domain-specific effects on QOL after treatment with radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.04.001