Grasping the diagonal: Controlling attention to illusory stimuli for action and perception

• Published in: Consciousness and cognition Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 223 - 228
• Main Authors: Stöttinger, Elisabeth, Aigner, Stefan, Hanstein, Klara, Perner, Josef
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 01.03.2009; Elsevier; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Attention; Biological and medical sciences; Cognition & reasoning; Conscious perception; Eyes & eyesight; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Illusions; Implicit knowledge; Judgment; Knowledge for action; Male; Motor ability; Obstacles avoidance; Optical illusions; Perception; Perceptual judgement; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Psychomotor Performance; Sensory perception; Space Perception; Vision; Visual illusions; Young Adult; Visual illusions; Obstacles avoidance; Knowledge for action; Conscious perception; Implicit knowledge; Perceptual judgement; Human; Gripping; Consciousness; Attention; Cognition; Vision; Body movement; Optical illusion; Perception; Upper limb; Motricity
• ISSN: 1053-8100; 1090-2376
• DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.04.003

Since the pioneering work of [Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5(6), 679–685] visual illusions have been used to provide evidence for the functional division of labour within the visual system—one system for conscious perception and the other system for unconscious guidance of action. However, these studies were criticised for attentional mismatch between action and perception conditions and for the fact that grip size is not determined by the size of an object but also by surrounding obstacles. Stoettinger and Perner [Stoettinger, E., & Perner, J., (2006). Dissociating size representations for action and for conscious judgment: Grasping visual illusions without apparent obstacles. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 269–284] used the diagonal illusion controlling for the influence of surrounding features on grip size and bimanual grasping to rule out attentional mismatch. Unfortunately, the latter objective was not fully achieved. In the present study, attentional mismatch was avoided by using only the dominant hand for action and for indicating perceived size. Results support the division of labour: Grip aperture follows actual size independent of illusory effects, while finger-thumb span indications of perceived length are clearly influenced by the illusion.