Does a choice of condoms impact sexually transmitted infection incidence? A randomized, controlled trial

The objective of this study was to assess whether providing a choice of condoms would increase condom acceptability, increase self-reported use, and decrease incident sexually transmitted infection. We randomized 414 men presenting with urethral discharge in Jamaica to receive either the "stand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSexually transmitted diseases Vol. 33; no. 1; p. 31
Main Authors Steiner, Markus J, Hylton-Kong, Tina, Figueroa, J Peter, Hobbs, Marcia M, Behets, Frieda, Smikle, Monica, Tweedy, Katie, Powell, Sharon, McNeil, Linda, Brathwaite, Alfred
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to assess whether providing a choice of condoms would increase condom acceptability, increase self-reported use, and decrease incident sexually transmitted infection. We randomized 414 men presenting with urethral discharge in Jamaica to receive either the "standard" clinic condom or a choice of 4 different types of condoms. Men were treated presumptively at enrollment and followed up at 1, 2, 4, and 6 months. Participants in the choice group had a strong preference (P <0.01) for the most popular condom available in Jamaica. This preference did not translate into higher condom use (P = 0.16). The 6-month cumulative probability of first incidence of gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis was slightly higher in the choice group (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15-28%) versus the control group (17%; 95% CI, 11-23%); the difference in the survival curves was not significant (P = 0.35). A choice of condoms may increase perceived acceptability but not lead to increased condom use and subsequently lower sexually transmitted infection rates.
ISSN:0148-5717
DOI:10.1097/01.olq.0000187200.07639.c6