Fibroblast activation protein, a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for cancer—reply

A second, perhaps more effective, strategy aims at targeting cells that express FAP by (1) conjugating toxins, cytokines, or radioisotope to FAP-specific antibodies as reviewed in Fischer et al [5]; as such, these toxins or radioisotope are expected to have a "bystander" deleterious effect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman pathology Vol. 45; no. 7; pp. 1553 - 1554
Main Authors Tchou, Julia, MD, PhD, Conejo-Garcia, Jose, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2014
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A second, perhaps more effective, strategy aims at targeting cells that express FAP by (1) conjugating toxins, cytokines, or radioisotope to FAP-specific antibodies as reviewed in Fischer et al [5]; as such, these toxins or radioisotope are expected to have a "bystander" deleterious effect on both FAP-expressing and non-FAP-expressing cells, that is, adjacent tumor cells; (2) eliminating FAP-expressing cells either using a genetic approach [6] or immunotherapy approach using chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cell) directed against FAP, which were designed to kill FAP-expressing cells [7]. Rather, we demonstrated that FAP expression in human breast cancer was observed not only in tumor-associated fibroblasts but also in other nonfibroblast stromal cells that expressed CD45 (a panleukocyte marker), CD14, CD11b, and HLA-DR, markers of TAMs. Because TAMs are known to have immunosuppressive functions within the tumor microenvironment, our results offer an alternate (or at least complementary) explanation to the results reported by Kraman et al [6].
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
ISSN:0046-8177
1532-8392
DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2013.11.022