Adapting re‐usable elastomeric respirators to utilise anaesthesia circuit filters using a 3D‐printed adaptor ‐ a potential alternative to address N95 shortages during the COVID‐19 pandemic

• Published in: Anaesthesia Vol. 75; no. 8; pp. 1022 - 1027
• Main Authors: Liu, D. C. Y., Koo, T. H., Wong, J. K. K., Wong, Y. H., Fung, K. S. C., Chan, Y., Lim, H. S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2020; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: 3D‐printed adaptor; Adult; anaesthesia circuit filter; Anesthesia; Betacoronavirus; breathing system filter; Carbon dioxide; Carbon Dioxide - physiology; Circuits; Coronavirus Infections - epidemiology; Coronavirus Infections - therapy; COVID-19; Elastomers; Equipment Design; Equipment Reuse; Exhalation; Feasibility Studies; Female; Filters; Filtration - instrumentation; Humans; Male; Materials Testing - methods; Middle Aged; Original; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral - epidemiology; Pneumonia, Viral - therapy; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Protective equipment; Respiration; respirator; Respirators; Respiratory Rate; SARS-CoV-2; Three dimensional printing; Ventilators, Mechanical - supply & distribution; Viruses; COVID-19; respirator; 3D-printed adaptor; breathing system filter; anaesthesia circuit filter
• ISSN: 0003-2409; 1365-2044
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.15108

Summary The COVID‐19 pandemic has increased the demand for disposable N95 respirators. Re‐usable elastomeric respirators may provide a suitable alternative. Proprietary elastomeric respirator filters may become depleted as demand increases. An alternative may be the virus/bacterial filters used in anaesthesia circuits, if they can be adequately fitted onto the elastomeric respirators. In addition, many re‐usable elastomeric respirators do not filter exhaled breaths. If used for sterile procedures, this would also require modification. We designed a 3D‐printed adaptor that permits elastomeric respirators to interface with anaesthesia circuit filters and created a simple modification to divert exhaled breaths through the filter. We conducted a feasibility study evaluating the performance of our modified elastomeric respirators. A convenience sample of eight volunteers was recruited. Quantitative fit testing, respiratory rate and end‐tidal carbon dioxide were recorded during fit testing exercises and after 1 h of wear. All eight volunteers obtained excellent quantitative fit testing throughout the trial. The mean (SD) end‐tidal carbon dioxide was 4.5 (0.5) kPa and 4.6 (0.4) kPa at baseline and after 1 h of wear (p = 0.148). The mean (SD) respiratory rate was 17 (4) breaths.min−1 and 17 (3) breaths.min−1 at baseline and after 1 h of wear (p = 0.435). Four out of eight subjects self‐reported discomfort; two reported facial pressure, one reported exhalation resistance and one reported transient dizziness on exertion. Re‐usable elastomeric respirators to utilise anaesthesia circuit filters through a 3D‐printed adaptor may be a potential alternative to disposable N95 respirators during the COVID‐19 pandemic.