Comparative clinical efficacy, onset and duration of action of levocetirizine and desloratadine for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in subjects evaluated in the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU)

Summary The Environmental Exposure Unit, an indoor pollen challenge system to test anti‐allergic medications, was used to compare the onset and duration of action and the efficacy of levocetirizine and desloratadine, two recently developed H1‐antagonists. In this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of clinical practice (Esher) Vol. 58; no. 2; pp. 109 - 118
Main Authors Day, J.H., Briscoe, M.P., Rafeiro, E., Ratz, J.D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK; Malden, USA Blackwell Science Ltd 01.02.2004
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary The Environmental Exposure Unit, an indoor pollen challenge system to test anti‐allergic medications, was used to compare the onset and duration of action and the efficacy of levocetirizine and desloratadine, two recently developed H1‐antagonists. In this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study, qualified subjects were randomised to once‐daily levocetirizine 5 mg (n = 141), desloratadine 5 mg (n = 140) or placebo (n = 92) and exposed to ragweed pollen on two consecutive days (7 h and 6 h). Symptoms were self‐rated every 30 min. On both days, levocetirizine produced a greater improvement in the major symptom complex score (primary efficacy variable) than desloratadine (p = 0.015); both were better than placebo (p < 0.001). Levocetirizine acted earlier (1 h vs. 3 h) and produced greater symptom relief at 24 h than desloratadine (p = 0.003). Levocetirizine also alleviated nasal obstruction better than desloratadine (p = 0.007) on day 1; and better than placebo (p = 0.014) after the second dose on day 2, which was not observed with desloratadine. Levocetirizine and desloratadine were safe and well tolerated.
Bibliography:istex:6F8CB624BF80CE92B3106C53F1524541BF45A1A2
ark:/67375/WNG-659TPR71-5
ArticleID:IJCP117
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1368-5031
1742-1241
DOI:10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.0117.x