Sex‐dependent differences in the ability of nicotine to modulate discrimination learning and cognitive flexibility in mice

• Published in: Journal of neurochemistry Vol. 169; no. 1; pp. e16227 - n/a
• Main Authors: Aomine, Yoshiatsu, Shimo, Yuto, Sakurai, Koki, Abe, Mayuka, Macpherson, Tom, Ozawa, Takaaki, Hikida, Takatoshi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2025; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Acetylcholine receptors (nicotinic); Animals; Cognition; Cognition & reasoning; Cognition - drug effects; Cognitive ability; cognitive flexibility; Discrimination Learning - drug effects; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Females; Flexibility; Gender differences; Genes; Innate immunity; Learning; Male; Males; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Molecular modelling; Nicotine; Nicotine - pharmacology; Nicotinic Agonists - pharmacology; Original; ORIGINAL ARTICLE; Prefrontal cortex; Protein structure; Proteins; protein–protein interaction network; Reversal learning; Reversal Learning - drug effects; RNA‐seq; Sex Characteristics; Sex differences; Tobacco; transcription factor analysis; Transcriptomics; Visual discrimination; Visual discrimination learning; reversal learning; transcription factor analysis; cognitive flexibility; visual discrimination learning; RNA‐seq; protein–protein interaction network
• ISSN: 0022-3042; 1471-4159; 1471-4159
• DOI: 10.1111/jnc.16227

Nicotine, an addictive compound found in tobacco, functions as an agonist of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the brain. Interestingly, nicotine has been reported to act as a cognitive enhancer in both human subjects and experimental animals. However, its effects in animal studies have not always been consistent, and sex differences have been identified in the effects of nicotine on several behaviors. Specifically, the role that sex plays in modulating the effects of nicotine on discrimination learning and cognitive flexibility in rodents is still unclear. Here, we evaluated sex‐dependent differences in the effect of daily nicotine intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration at various doses (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg) on visual discrimination (VD) learning and reversal (VDR) learning in mice. In male mice, 0.5 mg/kg nicotine significantly improved performance in the VDR, but not the VD, task, while 0.5 mg/kg nicotine significantly worsened performance in the VD, but not VDR task in female mice. Furthermore, 0.25 mg/kg nicotine significantly worsened performance in the VD and VDR task only in female mice. Next, to investigate the cellular mechanisms that underlie the sex difference in the effects of nicotine on cognition, transcriptomic analyses were performed focusing on the medial prefrontal cortex tissue samples from male and female mice that had received continuous administration of nicotine for 3 or 18 days. As a result of pathway enrichment analysis and protein–protein interaction analysis using gene sets of differentially expressed genes, decreased expression of postsynaptic‐related genes in males and increased expression of innate immunity‐related genes in females were identified as possible molecular mechanisms related to sex differences in the effects of nicotine on cognition in discrimination learning and cognitive flexibility. Our result suggests that nicotine modulates cognitive function in a sex‐dependent manner by alternating the expression of specific gene sets in the medial prefrontal cortex. Nicotine has been reported to act as a cognitive enhancer. However, its effects have not always been consistent, and sex differences have been identified on several behaviors. Specifically, the role that sex plays in modulating nicotine's effect on discrimination learning and cognitive flexibility in rodents is still unclear. Here, we evaluated sex‐dependent differences in the effect of nicotine on visual discrimination (VD) learning and reversal (VDR) learning. In male mice, nicotine significantly improved performance in VDR, but not VD, task, while, in female mice, nicotine significantly worsened performance in the VD, but not VDR, task. Next, to investigate the cellular mechanisms that underlie the sex differences in the effects of nicotine on cognition, transcriptomic analyses were performed.