Cortisol stress responses and children's behavioral functioning at school

The present study investigated whether cortisol stress responses of 6‐year‐olds were associated with their behavioral functioning at school. Additionally, the moderating role of stress in the family environment was examined. To this end, 149 healthy children (Mage = 6.09 years; 70 girls) participate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDevelopmental psychobiology Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 217 - 224
Main Authors Simons, Sterre S.H., Cillessen, Antonius H.N., de Weerth, Carolina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The present study investigated whether cortisol stress responses of 6‐year‐olds were associated with their behavioral functioning at school. Additionally, the moderating role of stress in the family environment was examined. To this end, 149 healthy children (Mage = 6.09 years; 70 girls) participated in an age‐appropriate innovative social evaluative stress test. Saliva cortisol samples were collected six times during the stress test to calculate two indices of the cortisol stress response: cortisol stress reactivity and total stress cortisol. Teachers assessed children's internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors. Stress in the family environment was operationalized as maternally reported parenting stress. Results indicated a significant increase in cortisol concentrations in response to the stressor. No significant associations were found between cortisol stress responses and behavioral functioning at school and there was no evidence for moderation by maternal parenting stress. Potential theoretical and methodological explanations for these results are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was published online on 24 Sep 2016. An error was subsequently identified. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected 4 Nov 2016.
The copyright line for this article was changed on 7 February 2017 after original online publication.
ISSN:0012-1630
1098-2302
DOI:10.1002/dev.21484