Feasibility study of shutter scan acquisition for region of interest (ROI) digital tomosynthesis

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 301 - 309
• Main Authors: Kim, Dohyeon, Jo, Byungdu, Lee, Donghoon, Lee, Haenghwa, Choi, Sunghoon, Kim, Hyemi, Chao, Zhen, Choi, Seungyeon, Kim, Hee‐Joung
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2018; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Algorithms; Clinical medicine; dose reduction; Feasibility studies; Laplace transforms; Medical Imaging; Noise; Quality; ROI reconstruction; Sensors; Tomography; Tomosynthesis; ROI reconstruction; dose reduction; Tomosynthesis
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12294

Dose reduction techniques have been studied in medical imaging. We propose shutter scan acquisition for region of interest (ROI) imaging to reduce the patient exposure dose received from a digital tomosynthesis system. A prototype chest digital tomosynthesis (CDT) system (LISTEM, Wonju, Korea) and the LUNGMAN phantom (Kyoto Kagaku, Japan) with lung nodules 8, 10, and 12 mm in size were used for this study. A total of 41 projections with shutter scan acquisition consisted of 21 truncated projections and 20 non‐truncated projections. For comparison, 41 projections using conventional full view scan acquisition were also acquired. Truncated projections obtained by shutter scan acquisition were corrected by proposed image processing procedure to remove the truncation artifacts. The image quality was evaluated using the contrast to noise ratio (CNR), coefficient of variation (COV), and figure of merit (FOM). We measured the dose area product (DAP) value to verify the dose reduction using shutter scan acquisition. The ROI of the reconstructed image from shutter scan acquisition showed enhanced contrast. The results showed that CNR values of 8 and 12 mm lung nodules increased by 6.38% and 21.21%, respectively, and the CNR value of 10 mm lung nodule decreased by 3.63%. COV values of the lung nodules were lower in a shutter scan image than in a full view scan image. FOM values of 8, 10, and 12 mm lung nodules increased by 3.06, 2.25, and 2.33 times, respectively. This study compared the proposed shutter scan and conventional full view scan acquisition. In conclusion, using a shutter scan acquisition method resulted in enhanced contrast images within the ROI and higher FOM values. The patient exposure dose of the proposed shutter scan acquisition method can be reduced by limiting the field of view (FOV) to focus on the ROI.