Transcriptome analysis provides critical answers to the “variants of uncertain significance” conundrum

While whole‐genome and exome sequencing have transformed our collective understanding of genetics' role in disease pathogenesis, there are certain conditions and populations for whom DNA‐level data fails to identify the underlying genetic etiology. Specifically, patients of non‐White race and n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman mutation Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 1590 - 1608
Main Authors Postel, Mackenzie D., Culver, Julie O., Ricker, Charité, Craig, David W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Hindawi Limited 01.11.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While whole‐genome and exome sequencing have transformed our collective understanding of genetics' role in disease pathogenesis, there are certain conditions and populations for whom DNA‐level data fails to identify the underlying genetic etiology. Specifically, patients of non‐White race and non‐European ancestry are disproportionately affected by “variants of unknown/uncertain significance” (VUS), limiting the scope of precision medicine for minority patients and perpetuating health disparities. VUS often include deep intronic and splicing variants which are difficult to interpret from DNA data alone. RNA analysis can illuminate the consequences of VUS, thereby allowing for their reclassification as pathogenic versus benign. Here we review the critical role transcriptome analysis plays in clarifying VUS in both neoplastic and non‐neoplastic diseases. RNA data tips the scales of molecular evidence, clarifying variants as benign or pathogenic.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1059-7794
1098-1004
1098-1004
DOI:10.1002/humu.24394