Characterization of active and infiltrative tumorous subregions from normal tissue in brain gliomas using multiparametric MRI

Background Targeted localized biopsies and treatments for diffuse gliomas rely on accurate identification of tissue subregions, for which current MRI techniques lack specificity. Purpose To explore the complementary and competitive roles of a variety of conventional and quantitative MRI methods for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 938 - 950
Main Authors Fathi Kazerooni, Anahita, Nabil, Mahnaz, Zeinali Zadeh, Mehdi, Firouznia, Kavous, Azmoudeh‐Ardalan, Farid, Frangi, Alejandro F., Davatzikos, Christos, Saligheh Rad, Hamidreza
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Targeted localized biopsies and treatments for diffuse gliomas rely on accurate identification of tissue subregions, for which current MRI techniques lack specificity. Purpose To explore the complementary and competitive roles of a variety of conventional and quantitative MRI methods for distinguishing subregions of brain gliomas. Study Type Prospective. Population Fifty‐one tissue specimens were collected using image‐guided localized biopsy surgery from 10 patients with newly diagnosed gliomas. Field Strength/Sequence Conventional and quantitative MR images consisting of pre‐ and postcontrast T1w, T2w, T2‐FLAIR, T2‐relaxometry, DWI, DTI, IVIM, and DSC‐MRI were acquired preoperatively at 3T. Assessment Biopsy specimens were histopathologically attributed to glioma tissue subregion categories of active tumor (AT), infiltrative edema (IE), and normal tissue (NT) subregions. For each tissue sample, a feature vector comprising 15 MRI‐based parameters was derived from preoperative images and assessed by a machine learning algorithm to determine the best multiparametric feature combination for characterizing the tissue subregions. Statistical Tests For discrimination of AT, IE, and NT subregions, a one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and for pairwise tissue subregion differentiation, Tukey honest significant difference, and Games‐Howell tests were applied (P < 0.05). Cross‐validated feature selection and classification methods were implemented for identification of accurate multiparametric MRI parameter combination. Results After exclusion of 17 tissue specimens, 34 samples (AT = 6, IE = 20, and NT = 8) were considered for analysis. Highest accuracies and statistically significant differences for discrimination of IE from NT and AT from NT were observed for diffusion‐based parameters (AUCs >90%), and the perfusion‐derived parameter as the most accurate feature in distinguishing IE from AT. A combination of “CBV, MD, T2_ISO, FLAIR” parameters showed high diagnostic performance for identification of the three subregions (AUC ∼90%). Data Conclusion Integration of a few quantitative along with conventional MRI parameters may provide a potential multiparametric imaging biomarker for predicting the histopathologically proven glioma tissue subregions. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:938–950.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.25963