The role of adjuvant treatment in early‐stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: An international collaborative study

BACKGROUND Up to half of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) have stage I to II disease. When adequate resection is attained, no further treatment is needed; however, re‐resection or radiotherapy may be indicated for patients with positive or close margins. This multicenter stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 124; no. 14; pp. 2948 - 2955
Main Authors Fridman, Eran, Na'ara, Shorook, Agarwal, Jaiprakash, Amit, Moran, Bachar, Gideon, Villaret, Andrea Bolzoni, Brandao, Jose, Cernea, Claudio R., Chaturvedi, Pankaj, Clark, Jonathan, Ebrahimi, Ardalan, Fliss, Dan M., Jonnalagadda, Sashikanth, Kohler, Hugo F., Kowalski, Luiz P., Kreppel, Matthias, Liao, Chun‐Ta, Patel, Snehal G., Patel, Rajan S., Robbins, K. Thomas, Shah, Jatin P., Shpitzer, Thomas, Yen, Tzu‐Chen, Zöller, Joachim E., Gil, Ziv
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 15.07.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND Up to half of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) have stage I to II disease. When adequate resection is attained, no further treatment is needed; however, re‐resection or radiotherapy may be indicated for patients with positive or close margins. This multicenter study evaluated the outcomes and role of adjuvant treatment in patients with stage I to II OCSCC. METHODS Overall survival (OS), disease‐specific survival, local‐free survival, and disease‐free survival rates were calculated with Kaplan‐Meier analysis. RESULTS Of 1257 patients with T1‐2N0M0 disease, 33 (2.6%) had positive margins, and 205 (16.3%) had close margins. The 5‐year OS rate was 80% for patients with clear margins, 52% for patients with close margins, and 63% for patients with positive margins (P < .0001). In a multivariate analysis, age, depth of invasion, and margins were independent predictors of outcome. Close margins were associated with a >2‐fold increase in the risk of recurrence (P < .0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that adjuvant treatment significantly improved the outcomes of patients with close/positive margins (P = .002 to .03). CONCLUSIONS Patients with stage I to II OCSCC and positive/close margins have poor long‐term outcomes. For this population, adjuvant treatment may be associated with improved survival. Cancer 2018;124:2948‐55. © 2018 American Cancer Society. Patients with stage I to II oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and positive/close margins have poor long‐term outcomes. For this population, adjuvant treatment is associated with improved survival.
Bibliography:We thank Cindy Cohen for her editorial assistance and Anat Reiner Benaim, PhD, for her statistical analysis and support.
The authors are members of the Oral Cancer International Study Group.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Eran Fridman: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing. Shorook Na’ara: Conceptualization, visualization, and writing–review and editing. Jaiprakash Agarwal: Resources and writing–review and editing. Moran Amit: Writing–review and editing. Gideon Bachar: Resources and writing–review and editing. Andrea Bolzoni Villaret: Writing–review and editing. Jose Brandao: Writing–review and editing. Claudio R. Cernea: Resources and writing–review and editing. Pankaj Chaturvedi: Writing–review and editing. Jonathan Clark: Writing–review and editing. Ardalan Ebrahimi: Resources and writing–review and editing. Dan M. Fliss: Resources and writing–review and editing. Sashikanth Jonnalagadda: Resources and writing–review and editing. Hugo F. Kohler: Writing–review and editing. Luiz P. Kowalski: Resources and writing–review and editing. Matthias Kreppel: Writing–review and editing. Chun-Ta Liao: Resources and writing–review and editing. Snehal G. Patel: Resources and writing–review and editing. Rajan S. Patel: Writing–review and editing. K. Thomas Robbins: Writing–review and editing. Jatin P. Shah: Writing–review and editing. Thomas Shpitzer: Writing–review and editing. Tzu-Chen Yen: Writing–review and editing. Joachim E. Zöller: Writing–review and editing. Ziv Gil: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing–original draft, and writing–review and editing.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.31531