Measuring Alertness

A generation of research in cognitive psychology has given rise to many tasks that tap at various aspects of attention. It is now widely agreed that attention is not a single thing and that its measurement needs a strategy to study each of its various aspects. While there is no widely agreed taxonom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 1129; no. 1; pp. 193 - 199
Main Author Posner, Michael I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.05.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A generation of research in cognitive psychology has given rise to many tasks that tap at various aspects of attention. It is now widely agreed that attention is not a single thing and that its measurement needs a strategy to study each of its various aspects. While there is no widely agreed taxonomy of attentional operations, there is an important distinction between functions of obtaining and maintaining the alert state (alerting network), orienting to sensory events (orienting network), and regulating thoughts and behaviors (executive network). Neuroimaging has confirmed that these functions involve separate but overlapping areas of brain activity. Neurochemical and genetic studies have also provided some distinctions between brain networks involved in attention. Alertness as a function of one important attentional network is emphasized and methods to activate phasic and tonic alerting are reviewed and individual or group differences in the efficiency of network operations are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:5B56B3C85EDBD9FB48EAD5BB6AA2B3FF3C18452E
ArticleID:NYAS1129011
ark:/67375/WNG-GD1QL0SH-P
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0077-8923
1749-6632
DOI:10.1196/annals.1417.011