Care transitions and social needs: A Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR) Network scoping review and consensus statement
Objectives Individual‐level social needs have been shown to substantially impact emergency department (ED) care transitions of older adults. The Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR) Network aimed to identify care transition interventions, particularly addressing social needs, and priorit...
Saved in:
Published in | Academic emergency medicine Vol. 28; no. 12; pp. 1430 - 1439 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives
Individual‐level social needs have been shown to substantially impact emergency department (ED) care transitions of older adults. The Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR) Network aimed to identify care transition interventions, particularly addressing social needs, and prioritize future research questions.
Methods
GEAR engaged 49 interdisciplinary stakeholders, derived clinical questions, and conducted searches of electronic databases to identify ED discharge care transition interventions in older adult populations. Informed by the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) framework, data extraction and synthesis of included studies included the degree that intervention components addressed social needs and their association with patient outcomes. GEAR convened a consensus conference to identify topics of highest priority for future care transitions research.
Results
Our search identified 248 unique articles addressing care transition interventions in older adult populations. Of these, 17 individual care transition intervention studies were included in the current literature synthesis. Overall, common care transition interventions included coordination efforts, comprehensive geriatric assessments, discharge planning, and telephone or in‐person follow‐up. Fourteen of the 17 care transition intervention studies in older adults specifically addressed at least one social need within the PRAPARE framework, most commonly related to access to food, medicine, or health care. No care transition intervention addressing social needs in older adult populations consistently reduced subsequent health care utilization or other patient‐centered outcomes. GEAR stakeholders identified that determining optimal outcome measures for ED–home transition interventions was the highest priority area for future care transitions research.
Conclusions
ED care transition intervention studies in older adults frequently address at least one social need component and exhibit variation in the degree of success on a wide array of health care utilization outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Harrison J. Alter, MD, MS. Supervising Editor GEAR is supported by the National Institute on Aging grant R21AG058926 (to Dr. Hwang), the John A Hartford Foundation, and the Gary and Mary West Health Institute. Dr. Gettel is supported by the Yale National Clinician Scholars Program and by CTSA grant number TL1 TR00864 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Ms. Gladney and Dr. Hastings received support from the Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (CIN 13‐410) at the Durham VA Health Care System. Dr. Voils is supported by Research Career Scientist award (RCS 14‐443) from the Health Services Research & Development service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The contents do not represent the views of the DVA or the United States Government. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation or approval of the manuscript. Portions of this research were selected for poster presentation at the 2020 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine annual meeting. However, this meeting was canceled due to public health concerns. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Study concept and design—Ula Hwang, Susan N. Hastings; acquisition of the data—Cameron J. Gettel, Corrine I. Voils, Alycia A. Bristol, Lynne D. Richardson, Teresita M. Hogan, Alycia A. Bristol, Micaela N. Gladney, Joe Suyama, Luna C. Ragsdale, Christine L. Binkley, Carmen L. Morano, Justine Seidenfeld, Nada Hammouda, Kelly J. Ko, Ula Hwang, Susan N. Hastings; analysis and interpretation of the data—Cameron J. Gettel, Corrine I. Voils, Alycia A. Bristol, Lynne D. Richardson, Teresita M. Hogan, Abraham A. Brody, Micaela N. Gladney, Joe Suyama, Luna C. Ragsdale, Christine L. Binkley, Carmen L. Morano, Justine Seidenfeld, Nada Hammouda, Kelly J. Ko, Ula Hwang, Susan N. Hastings; drafting of the manuscript—Cameron J. Gettel, Alycia A. Bristol, Joe Suyama, Susan N. Hastings; critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content—Cameron J. Gettel, Corrine I. Voils, Alycia A. Bristol, Lynne D. Richardson, Teresita M. Hogan, Abraham A. Brody, Micaela N. Gladney, Joe Suyama, Luna C. Ragsdale, Christine L. Binkley, Carmen L. Morano, Justine Seidenfeld, Nada Hammouda, Kelly J. Ko, Ula Hwang, Susan N. Hastings; statistical expertise—N/A; acquisition of funding—Ula Hwang. |
ISSN: | 1069-6563 1553-2712 1553-2712 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acem.14360 |