Jail as a Point of Contraceptive Care Access: Needs and Preferences Among Women in an Urban Jail

• Published in: Journal of midwifery & women's health Vol. 66; no. 6; pp. 787 - 794
• Main Authors: Myers, Kyl, Dalessandro, Cristen, Geist, Claudia, Sufrin, Carolyn
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2021
• Subjects: Access; Birth control; Coercion; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive services; correctional health care; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demography; Desire; Family planning; Family Planning Services; Female; Health care; Humans; Implants; Imprisonment; incarceration; Intrauterine devices; IUD; Jails; Medical personnel; Polls & surveys; Prisoners; Prisons; Utah; Women; Womens health; United States > US; Utah; jails; incarceration; contraception; Utah; correctional health care
• ISSN: 1526-9523; 1542-2011
• DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13270

Introduction Individuals who are incarcerated in the United States often struggle to access family planning care because of the common practice of jails not providing contraceptives on site. However, less is known about the contraceptive needs and preferences, including the desirability of intrauterine devices and implants, among those who are incarcerated. Methods Cross‐sectional, in‐person surveys were administered to 148 reproductive‐age women (aged 18‐48) incarcerated at an urban jail in Utah to identify women's contraceptive needs and preferences while incarcerated. We used summary statistics and logistic regression to investigate relationships between demographic characteristics, the desire to access contraceptive services while incarcerated, and interest in specific contraceptive methods. Results Surveys indicate a high interest in accessing contraceptives while in jail (73%). Participants who were more likely to prefer access to contraceptive services in jail were also more likely to be interested in the injectable (odds ratio [OR], 4.75; 95% CI, 1.03‐21.94), the implant (OR, 8.44; 95% CI, 1.70‐41.99), and intrauterine devices (OR, 10.04; 95% CI, 3.46‐29.20) than participants indicating no desire to access contraceptive services while in jail. Discussion Jails could be an access point for contraceptive methods requiring health care provider intervention in the state of Utah. However, care must be taken due to broader historical legacies of reproductive coercion in carceral settings.