LI-RADS 4 or 5 categorization may not be clinically relevant for decision-making processes: A prospective cohort study

▪ The liver imaging reporting data system (LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was proposed to standardize and enhance consensus of reporting. However, clinical utility of LI-RADS has not been evaluated in Latin America. We therefore sought to compare LI-RADS categories with histopathology f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of hepatology Vol. 19; no. 6; pp. 662 - 667
Main Authors Piñero, Federico, Thompson, Marcos A., Diaz Telli, Federico, Trentacoste, Juan, Padín, Carlos, Mendizabal, Manuel, Colaci, Carla, Gonzalez Campaña, Ariel, Pages, Josefina, Montal, Silvina, Barreiro, Mariano, Fauda, Martín, Podestá, Gustavo, Perotti, Juan Pablo, Silva, Marcelo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier España, S.L.U 01.11.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:▪ The liver imaging reporting data system (LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was proposed to standardize and enhance consensus of reporting. However, clinical utility of LI-RADS has not been evaluated in Latin America. We therefore sought to compare LI-RADS categories with histopathology findings in liver transplant (LT) explants in a regional center. Prospective cohort study conducted between 2012 and 2018 in a single center from Argentina including patients with HCC listed for LT. LI-RADS definitions were applied to magnetic resonance images (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) abdominal scans at time of listing and at final pre-LT reassessment and compared to explant pathology findings; specifically, major nodule (NOD1). Of 130 patients with HCC listed for LT (96.1% with cirrhosis and 35.6% with hepatitis C virus infection), 72 underwent LT. Overall, 65% had imaging HCC diagnosis based on MRI (n = 84), 26% with CT (n = 34) and 9% (n = 12) with both methods. Among LT patients with pre-transplant imaging at our institution (n = 42/72), 69% of the NOD1 were LR-5, 21% LR-4 and 10% LR-3. Definite HCC diagnosis was 50% in LR-3 NOD1 (CI 18–90); none presented microvascular invasion. In LR-4 NOD1, HCC was confirmed in 89% (CI 59–98), of which 11% showed microvascular invasion; whereas in LR-5 NOD1 77% (CI 64–87) had confirmed HCC, 17% with microvascular invasion. LI-RADS was useful to standardize reports; however, no significant differences were observed between LR-4 and LR-5 HCC probability when compared to explant pathology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1665-2681
2659-5982
DOI:10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007