The Photoperiodic Flowering Time Regulator FKF1 Negatively Regulates Cellulose Biosynthesis
Cellulose synthesis is precisely regulated by internal and external cues, and emerging evidence suggests that light regulates cellulose biosynthesis through specific light receptors. Recently, the blue light receptor CRYPTOCHROME 1 (CRY1) was shown to positively regulate secondary cell wall biosynth...
Saved in:
Published in | Plant physiology (Bethesda) Vol. 180; no. 4; pp. 2240 - 2253 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society of Plant Biologists
01.08.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Cellulose synthesis is precisely regulated by internal and external cues, and emerging evidence suggests that light regulates cellulose biosynthesis through specific light receptors. Recently, the blue light receptor CRYPTOCHROME 1 (CRY1) was shown to positively regulate secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis (
). Here, we characterize the role of
,
(
), another blue light receptor and well-known photoperiodic flowering time regulator, in cellulose biosynthesis. A phenotype suppression screen using a cellulose deficient mutant
(
), which carries nonlethal point mutations in
(
) and
, resulted in identification of the phenotype-restoring
(
) mutant. Next-generation mapping using the whole genome resequencing method identified the
locus as
was confirmed as the causal gene through observation of the
phenotype in an independent triple mutant
carrying a
T-DNA insertion mutant. Moreover, overexpression of
in
plants restored the
phenotype. The
mutants showed significant increases in cellulose content and
gene expression compared with that in wild-type Columbia-0 plants, suggesting a negative role of FKF1 in cellulose biosynthesis. Using genetic, molecular, and phenocopy and biochemical evidence, we have firmly established the role of FKF1 in regulation of cellulose biosynthesis. In addition,
expression analysis showed that diurnal expression patterns of
s are FKF1 independent, whereas their circadian expression patterns are FKF1 dependent. Overall, our work establishes a role of FKF1 in the regulation of cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Senior author. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.19.00013 N.Y. performed molecular, genetic, phenocopy, and gene expression analysis; N.Y. and V.K.B. wrote the first draft; N.Y., V.K.B., and R.C. edited the article; V.K.B. generated mutants and mapping population and performed biochemical analysis; R.C. performed bioinformatic analysis; V.M. conceived the idea and designed experiments; all the authors read and approved the final draft. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Venugopal Mendu (venugopal.mendu@ttu.edu). These authors contributed equally to the article. |
ISSN: | 0032-0889 1532-2548 |
DOI: | 10.1104/pp.19.00013 |