HTUPA as a new thrombolytic agent for acute myocardial infarction: A multicenter, randomized study
Abstract Background It is necessary to develop a new thrombolytic agent which can be used by a single bolus at first aid sites to decrease the time to reperfusion in clinical practice. HTUPA, a genetically engineered new thrombolytic with a longer half-life, is well qualified. We aim to compare the...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of cardiology Vol. 172; no. 2; pp. 326 - 331 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Shannon
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
15.03.2014
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Background It is necessary to develop a new thrombolytic agent which can be used by a single bolus at first aid sites to decrease the time to reperfusion in clinical practice. HTUPA, a genetically engineered new thrombolytic with a longer half-life, is well qualified. We aim to compare the thrombolytic efficacy and safety of human tissue urokinase type plasminogen activator (HTUPA) to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods AMI patients (n = 221) were randomized to rt-PA (a standard protocol) or HTUPA (25 mg bolus) treatment groups. All patients also received oral aspirin and intravenous heparin. Coronary angiography was performed 90 min after therapy initiation to determine infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) patency. Clinical outcomes and changes of clotting variables, heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and electrocardiogram were evaluated. Results Patent IRA [thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 2 or 3] was observed in 77% of HTUPA-treated patients, compared to 76% of rt-PA-treated patients ( P = 0.76). TIMI grade 3 patency rates were 52% and 44% in the HTUPA and rt-PA groups, respectively ( P = 0.37). The total patency rate was 77% (86/111 patients) in the HTUPA group and 73% (80/110 patients) in the rt-PA group ( P = 0.41). Adverse events were infrequent in both groups, and no significant differences were detected in mortality, re-occlusion rate, revascularization rate, adverse effects, clotting index, LVEF, or electrocardiogram between the two groups. Conclusions Intravenous HTUPA had a safe and efficacious profile as good as rt-PA in patients with AMI. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-5273 1874-1754 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.018 |