Development of an ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry multi-residue sulfonamide method and its application to water, manure slurry, and soils from swine rearing facilities

An analytical method was developed using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–TQ-MS/MS) to simultaneously analyze 14 sulfonamides (SA) in 6 min. Despite the rapidity of the assay the system was properly re-equilibrated in this time. No carryover...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Chromatography A Vol. 1217; no. 8; pp. 1273 - 1282
Main Authors Shelver, Weilin L., Hakk, Heldur, Larsen, Gerald L., DeSutter, Thomas M., Casey, Francis X.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 19.02.2010
Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An analytical method was developed using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–TQ-MS/MS) to simultaneously analyze 14 sulfonamides (SA) in 6 min. Despite the rapidity of the assay the system was properly re-equilibrated in this time. No carryover was observed even after high analyte concentrations. The instrumental detection limit based on signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) > 3, was below 1 pg/μL (5 pg on column) for all SAs except sulfachloropyridazine. Surface water, ground water, soil, and slurry manure contained in storage ponds in and around swine [ Sus scrofa domesticus] rearing facilities were analyzed. Sample cleanup for ground water and surface water included using solid phase extraction (SPE) using Oasis ® hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) cartridges. The soil and slurry manure required tandem strong anion exchange (SAX) and HLB solid phase extraction cartridges for sample cleanup. With few exceptions, the recoveries ranged from 60 to 100% for all matrices. The minimum detectable levels were below 2.0 ng/L for water, 30 ng/L for slurry manure, and 45 ng/kg for soil except for sulfachloropyridazine. The coefficient of variation (CV) was within 20% for most of the compounds analyzed. Using this method, sulfamethazine concentrations of 2250–5060 ng/L, sulfamethoxazole concentrations of 108–1.47 × 10 6 ng/L, and sulfathiazole concentrations of 785–1700 ng/L were found in the slurry manure. Sulfadimethoxine (2.0–32 ng/L), sulfamethazine (2.0–5.1 ng/L), and sulfamethoxazole (20.5–43.0 ng/L) were found in surface water and ground water. In top soil (0–15 cm), sulfamethazine ranged 34.5–663 ng/kg dry weight in those locations that received slurry manure as a nutrient; no SAs were found in the soil depths between 46 and 61 cm. The speed makes the method practical for medium to high throughput applications. The sensitivity and positive analyte identification make the method suitable for the demanding requirements for real world applications.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.034
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/38966
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9673
1873-3778
DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.034