Assessing mental representation of mastoidectomy by a computer-based drawing tool

• Published in: Acta oto-laryngologica Vol. 130; no. 12; pp. 1335 - 1342
• Main Authors: Bozorg Grayeli, Alexis, Bernardeschi, Daniele, Sonji, Guy, Elgarem, Hani, Sterkers, Olivier, Ferrary, Evelyne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Stockholm Informa Healthcare 01.12.2010; Taylor & Francis; Informa
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Clinical Competence; Computer Graphics; Computer Simulation; Curriculum; Evaluation; Female; graphic software; Humans; Male; Mastoid - anatomy & histology; Mastoid - surgery; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Models, Anatomic; Otolaryngology - education; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology; Prospective Studies; simulation; surgical training; Graphics; Evaluation; surgical training; Treatment; Mental representation; Simulation; Surgery; Software; ENT; graphic software; Mastoidectomy
• ISSN: 0001-6489; 1651-2251; 1651-2251
• DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2010.499542

Abstract Conclusions: This simple computer-based drawing tool provides valid information on mental representation of mastoidectomy at its initial phase. Objective: The aim of this study was to elaborate a simple computer-based drawing tool to assess the mental representation of mastoidectomy. Methods: Twelve trainees in otology (five beginners, seven mid-level) and four otology experts participated in this prospective study. The image of a mastoid was displayed on a screen. All subjects reproduced the movements of mastoidectomy with a pen on a graphic tablet. Movements appeared as gray lines on the image. Surgeons were evaluated before and after a dissection course. The surface of mastoidectomy, perimeter, circularity, and the angle between traces and cavity edges were measured by Image J software. Results: The total surface of mastoidectomy was higher in experts than in mid-level and beginner trainees (respectively 99 ± 6.5%, vs 57 ± 1.5%, and 22 ± 5.6%, p < 0.01 for experts vs beginners and p < 0.05 for experts vs mid-level, ANOVA and Bonferroni). Circularity was also higher in experts than in trainees. After training, total surface and circularity increased. The angle between traces and cavity edges was lower in experts than in trainees and was reduced after training.