Uncontrolled blood pressure and therapeutic inertia in treated hypertensive patients: A retrospective cohort study using a UK general practice database

• Published in: The journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) Vol. 25; no. 10; pp. 895 - 904
• Main Authors: Darricarrere, Céline, Jacquot, Emmanuelle, Bricout, Stéphanie, Louis, Caroline, Bénard, Marc, Poulter, Neil R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.10.2023; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: antihypertensive agents; Antihypertensives; Blood pressure; Clinical medicine; Cohort analysis; cohort studies; Hypertension; Longitudinal studies; Medical records; Original; Patients; physicians; Primary care; Therapeutic Inertia; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 1524-6175; 1751-7176
• DOI: 10.1111/jch.14699

Abstract Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) and therapeutic inertia pose significant challenges in effectively managing hypertension. This study objective was to quantify levels of uncontrolled BP and therapeutic inertia among patients treated for hypertension in primary care. This retrospective cohort study used data recorded by general practitioners from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. Adults with primary hypertension who received a recorded prescription for any antihypertensive drug between January 2015 and June 2017 (index date) were included, with a follow‐up of 18 months. Primary outcomes included the percentage of patients with uncontrolled BP (defined as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg) and of apparent therapeutic inertia (defined as two consecutive uncontrolled BP records without treatment change) during follow‐up. Finally, of 581 260 patients receiving antihypertensive drug(s), 37.2% ( n  = 216 014) had uncontrolled BP at the index date and 30.3% ( n  = 175 955) had no record of BP at this date. During follow‐up, 59.2% had ≥1 record of uncontrolled BP, in 22% all records showed uncontrolled BP, and 12.8% had no record of BP. Among those with uncontrolled BP at the index date, 72.9% had ≥1 record of uncontrolled BP during follow‐up, and in 28.3% all records showed uncontrolled BP. Therapeutic inertia was observed in 33.1% of patients overall, and in 55.7% of those with uncontrolled BP at the index date. In conclusion, BP recording was infrequent, possibly reflecting both a low frequency of measurement and potential under‐recording. Uncontrolled BP and therapeutic inertia appear to be widespread in UK general practice.