A Comparative Study Between Smartphone-Based Microscopy and Conventional Light Microscopy in 1021 Dermatopathology Specimens

• Published in: Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) Vol. 140; no. 1; pp. 86 - 90
• Main Authors: Jahan-Tigh, Richard R, Chinn, Garrett M, Rapini, Ronald P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States College of American Pathologists 01.01.2016
• Subjects: Cameras (Photography); Humans; Melanoma; Microscopy; Microscopy - instrumentation; Pathology, Clinical - instrumentation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Skin; Skin cancer; Skin Diseases - diagnosis; Skin Neoplasms - diagnosis; Smart phones; Smartphone - instrumentation; Squamous cell carcinoma
• ISSN: 0003-9985; 1543-2165; 1543-2165
• DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0593-OA

The incorporation of high-resolution cameras into smartphones has allowed for a variety of medical applications including the use of lens attachments that provide telescopic, macroscopic, and dermatoscopic data, but the feasibility and performance characteristics of such a platform for use in dermatopathology have not been described. To determine the diagnostic performance of a smartphone microscope compared to traditional light microscopy in dermatopathology specimens. A simple smartphone microscope constructed with a 3-mm ball lens was used to prospectively evaluate 1021 consecutive dermatopathology cases in a blinded fashion. Referred, consecutive specimens from the community were evaluated at a single university hospital. The performance characteristics of the smartphone platform were calculated by using conventional light microscopy as the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancers, and other miscellaneous conditions by the phone microscopy platform, as compared with traditional light microscopy, were calculated. For basal cell carcinoma (n = 136), the sensitivity and specificity of smartphone microscopy were 95.6% and 98.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for squamous cell carcinoma (n = 94) were 89.4% and 97.3%, respectively. The lowest sensitivity was found in melanoma (n = 15) at 60%, although the specificity was high at 99.1%. The accuracy of diagnosis of inflammatory conditions and other neoplasms was variable. Mobile phone-based microscopy has excellent performance characteristics for the inexpensive diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancers in a setting where a traditional microscope is not available.