Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing

•The article examines student interactions in collaborative prewriting discussions.•Structured tasks lead to more reflective content and organization episodes.•No direct relationship between level of reflection and text quality was found.•Implications for use of these tasks in EAP contexts are discu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of second language writing Vol. 27; no. Mar; pp. 84 - 104
Main Authors Neumann, Heike, McDonough, Kim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The article examines student interactions in collaborative prewriting discussions.•Structured tasks lead to more reflective content and organization episodes.•No direct relationship between level of reflection and text quality was found.•Implications for use of these tasks in EAP contexts are discussed. In second language (L2) writing classrooms, prewriting discussions are one of the most commonly used collaborative activities (Fernández Dobao, 2012; Storch, 2005), yet there has been little research about their relationship to students’ written texts. Recent L2 writing research has examined the textual features of co-constructed texts (e.g., Elola & Oskoz, 2010; Kuiken & Vedder, 2002; Storch & Wigglesworth, 2007), whereas the pretask planning literature has focused mainly on the effect of individual planning (e.g., Ellis & Yuan, 2004; Kroll, 1990; Ojima, 2006). The current study investigates the relationship between interaction during collaborative prewriting tasks and students’ written texts in an English for academic purposes (EAP) course. The findings indicate that structured collaborative prewriting tasks elicited student talk about content and organization, but there is only a moderate relationships between these prewriting discussions and the students’ written texts. Implications for the use of collaborative prewriting discussions in EAP contexts are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1060-3743
1873-1422
DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.009