Norm Entrepreneurship in Digital Trade: The Singapore-led Wave of Digital Trade Agreements

Rulemaking in digital trade is proceeding apace. Many preferential trade agreements contain dedicated e-commerce or digital trade chapters and some states have entered into stand-alone digital economy agreements. This article seeks to establish whether, and to what extent, normative change is occurr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld trade review Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 208 - 241
Main Authors Jones, Emily, Kira, Beatriz, Tavengerwei, Rutendo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rulemaking in digital trade is proceeding apace. Many preferential trade agreements contain dedicated e-commerce or digital trade chapters and some states have entered into stand-alone digital economy agreements. This article seeks to establish whether, and to what extent, normative change is occurring in digital trade agreements, the nature of any changes, and identify which states are acting as norm entrepreneurs. We employ a new method of legal coding, systematically comparing the nature and prescriptiveness of digital provisions in 12 trade agreements concluded between 2019 and 2023. We find evidence of substantial policy innovation, and identify Singapore as the key norm entrepreneur. A new wave of ‘Singapore-led’ agreements substantially expands the scope of digital trade, to cover areas such as digital identities, e-invoicing and e-payments, the governance of AI, and regulation of new digital technologies. Commitments are typically couched as soft rather than hard law, reflecting the nascent stages of rulemaking. Norm entrepreneurship on the part of Singapore and its allies reflects a desire to position themselves as ‘digital hubs’ in the global economy, spur rulemaking in areas where innovation is ahead of regulation, and promote digital interconnectivity at time of regulatory divergence and geopolitical rivalry.
ISSN:1474-7456
1475-3138
DOI:10.1017/S1474745624000089