Multiple screw fixation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femur neck fracture using a nationwide hip fracture registry

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 21461
• Main Authors: Kim, Jin-Woo, Park, Kyung-Soon, Lee, Young-Kyun, Kim, Ji Wan, Ha, Yong-Chan, Baek, Seung-Hoon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Nature Publishing Group 02.11.2021; Nature Publishing Group UK; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: Aged; Anesthesia; Blood; Bone implants; Bone Screws - statistics & numerical data; Female; Femoral Neck Fractures - pathology; Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery; Femur; Follow-Up Studies; Fractures; Hemiarthroplasty - methods; Hip; Hip Fractures - pathology; Hip Fractures - surgery; Humans; Male; Mortality; Older people; Patients; Pelvic Bones - pathology; Pelvic Bones - surgery; Prospective Studies; Registries - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01046-3

Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) recently gained popularity as a treatment for femur neck fracture (FNF), but there have been few studies comparing this with multiple screw fixation (MSF) in the elderly population. The purpose of this study is to compare (1) surgery-related parameters, (2) reoperation rate as a local complication, (3) in-hospital systemic complication rate, and (4) mortality rate at 1 year after MSF and cementless BHA in patients with FNF using nationwide data. Six-hundred sixty-six hips (aged ≥ 50 years) extracted from nationwide Hip Fracture Registry were included in this study (133 MSF and 533 cementless BHA). One hundred fifty-six hips were divided into nondisplaced FNF (Group A) and 510 into displaced FNF (Group B). We evaluated (1) surgery-related parameters (anesthesia type, time to surgery, operation time, estimated blood loss and volume of postoperative transfusion), (2) the rate of and reasons for reoperation, (3) the rate and type of in-hospital systemic complications and (4) one-year mortality rate after surgery. In Group A, MSF showed shorter operation time (p = 0.004) and lower incidence of in-hospital systemic complications (p = 0.003). In Group B, cementless BHA demonstrated lower reoperation rate than MSF (p < 0.001). In both Group A and B, cementless BHA was associated with higher estimated blood loss than MSF (p < 0.001). Based on findings in our study, MSF might be a more favorable option for nondisplaced FNF, whereas cementless BHA might be a better one for displaced FNF in patients older than fifty. Nevertheless, our nationwide study also showed that numbers of cementless BHAs were being performed for nondisplaced FNF even in teaching hospitals.