Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography

Highlights • Agreement between actigraphy and polysomnography depends on placement of the device. • Hip placement cannot be recommended when analysis tools for wrist-placement are used. • Low agreement for number of awakenings after sleep onset and sleep onset latency for any method versus polysomno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSleep medicine Vol. 15; no. 9; pp. 1107 - 1114
Main Authors Zinkhan, Melanie, Berger, Klaus, Hense, Sabrina, Nagel, Maren, Obst, Anne, Koch, Beate, Penzel, Thomas, Fietze, Ingo, Ahrens, Wolfgang, Young, Peter, Happe, Svenja, Kantelhardt, Jan W, Kluttig, Alexander, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak, Andrea, Pillmann, Frank, Stang, Andreas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2014
Subjects
Actigraphy
Actigraphy - instrumentation
Actigraphy - methods
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Agreement
Female
GT3X
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurology
Placement (hip, wrist)
Polysomnography
Polysomnography - instrumentation
Polysomnography - methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Self Report
Sleep Medicine
SOMNOwatch
Young Adult
Agreement
GT3X
SOMNOwatch
Actigraphy
Placement (hip, wrist)
Polysomnography
Self-report
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Highlights • Agreement between actigraphy and polysomnography depends on placement of the device. • Hip placement cannot be recommended when analysis tools for wrist-placement are used. • Low agreement for number of awakenings after sleep onset and sleep onset latency for any method versus polysomnography. • Agreement of self-report and of actigraphy with polysomnography are comparable in some cases.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1389-9457
1878-5506
DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.04.015