Plant reintroduction in restored peatlands: 80% successfully transferred – Does the remaining 20% matter?

In ecological restoration, especially in projects aiming at introducing a diverse plant community, species that do not establish are rarely reported., Yet, knowledge gained from identifying and understanding the reasons why species did not establish is useful to improve restoration techniques. In th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal ecology and conservation Vol. 22; p. e01000
Main Authors Hugron, Sandrine, Guêné-Nanchen, Mélina, Roux, Noémie, LeBlanc, Marie-Claire, Rochefort, Line
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.06.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In ecological restoration, especially in projects aiming at introducing a diverse plant community, species that do not establish are rarely reported., Yet, knowledge gained from identifying and understanding the reasons why species did not establish is useful to improve restoration techniques. In this paper, we used Sphagnum dominated peatlands restored with the Moss Layer Transfer Technique (MLTT) as a typical example of restored ecosystems for which information about species that does not establish is lacking. By comparing the plant species pools of 22 pairs of donor/restored Sphagnum peatlands (including 17 sites restored for more than 10 years), we calculated that the proportion of successfully introduced plant species (transfer rate) was 82 ± 9%, amongst the highest transfer rate when compared to other restoration projects. Only five vascular plant species were classified as recalcitrant – species present in the donor site but absent from the restored sites: Carex trisperma, Cypripedium acaule, Ilex mucronata, Maianthemum trifolium and Rubus chamaemorus. Explanations about the filters impeding establishment were mainly based on the autoecology of the species. Depending on restoration goals (e.g. return of edible berries or orchid diversity) we recommend the specific reintroduction of recalcitrant species after the MLTT. •The MLTT average transfer rate for 22 pairs of donor/restored peatlands was 82 ± 9%.•5 species were recalcitrant to the MLTT used for Sphagnum peatland restoration.•Explanation of recalcitrance links into the autoecology of plant species.•Targeted reintroduction is necessary for recalcitrant species, if part of the restoration goals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2351-9894
2351-9894
DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01000