Reduction of protein concentration range difference followed by multicolumn fractionation prior to 2-DE and LC-MS/MS profiling of serum proteins

This article is concerned with the reduction of protein concentration range differences by the peptide beads library technology (ProteoMiner™ or “equalizer” technology), which in principle allows the enrichment of proteins to the same concentration level (i.e. protein equalizer) regardless of the or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inElectrophoresis Vol. 32; no. 6-7; pp. 674 - 685
Main Authors Selvaraju, Subhashini, El Rassi, Ziad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.03.2011
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0173-0835
1522-2683
1522-2683
DOI10.1002/elps.201000606

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article is concerned with the reduction of protein concentration range differences by the peptide beads library technology (ProteoMiner™ or “equalizer” technology), which in principle allows the enrichment of proteins to the same concentration level (i.e. protein equalizer) regardless of the original protein abundance in a given biological fluid such as human serum, which is the subject of our investigation. After the equalization step, the captured proteins from human serum were fractionated on a series of tandem monolithic columns with surface‐bound iminodiacetic acid ligands to which three different metal ions, namely, Zn2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+ were immobilized to yield the so‐called immobilized metal affinity chromatography columns. These three monolithic columns were connected to a reversed‐phase column packed with polystyrene divinyl benzene beads. Aliquots taken from the four collected fractions from the four tandem columns were subsequently fractionated by 2‐DE. Also, aliquots from the four collected fractions were tryptically digested and analyzed by LC‐MS/MS. The strategy of subsequent fractionation on the four tandem columns after equalization allowed the identification of more proteins than simply using the equalization by ProteoMiner™. The equalizer technology was compared to the immuno‐subtraction approach. While the ProteoMiner™ technology is superior in terms of the overall number of captured proteins, it only complements the immuno‐subtraction approach since the latter can capture the proteins that were not captured by the former.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-GWN1GL4K-0
Oklahoma State University
NSF MRI and EPSCoR programs - No. 0722494
ArticleID:ELPS201000606
istex:0A78DA4D0EE0B3028F5176F674C7C876018BDD4A
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0173-0835
1522-2683
1522-2683
DOI:10.1002/elps.201000606