Comparative study of a DNA hybridization method and two isolation procedures for detection of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in naturally contaminated pork products

• Published in: Applied and Environmental Microbiology Vol. 57; no. 2; pp. 389 - 394
• Main Authors: Nesbakken, T. (Norwegian Meat Research Laboratory, Oslo), Kapperud, G, Dommarsnes, K, Skurnik, M, Hornes, E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Society for Microbiology 01.02.1991
• Subjects: ADN; ALIMENTOS; Animals; Bacteriological Techniques; CARNE DE CERDO; DNA Probes; DNA, Bacterial - genetics; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Food Microbiology; Meat Products - adverse effects; METHODE; METODOS; Molecular Probe Techniques; NORUEGA; NORVEGE; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; PRODUIT ALIMENTAIRE; SEROTIPOS; SEROTYPE; Swine; VIANDE PORCINE; YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA; Yersinia enterocolitica - genetics; Yersinia enterocolitica - isolation & purification
• ISSN: 0099-2240; 1098-5336
• DOI: 10.1128/aem.57.2.389-394.1991

We compared a DNA-DNA hybridization assay, using a synthetically produced oligonucleotide probe, and two conventional isolation procedures (methods A and B) with regard to their relative efficiency in detecting Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in naturally contaminated pork products. Method A was as described by Wauters et al. (Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:851-854, 1988). Method B has been recommended by the Nordic Committee on Food Analysis (method no. 117, 1987). The genetic probe was used in a colony hybridization assay to detect virulent yersiniae at each of the isolation steps which composed methods A and B. A total of 50 samples of raw pork products obtained from 13 meat-processing factories in Norway were examined. Y. enterocolitica serogroup O:3, biovar 4, was isolated from altogether 9 (18.0%) of the samples by using the two isolation procedures. In contrast, colony hybridization using the genetic probe indicated that 30 (60.0%) of the samples contained virulent yersiniae. All samples which were positive on cultivation were also positive by hybridization. The results indicate that the occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in Norwegian pork products is substantially higher than previously demonstrated and, therefore, reinforce our suggestion that pork products represent an important potential source of human infection in Norway. The results also indicate that the use of conventional isolation procedures may lead to considerable underestimation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pork products