Morphological and Spatio‐Temporal Mismatches Shape a Neotropical Savanna Plant‐Hummingbird Network
Complex networks of species interactions might be determined by species traits but also by simple chance meetings governed by species abundances. Although the idea that species traits structure mutualistic networks is appealing, most studies have found abundance to be a major structuring mechanism u...
Saved in:
Published in | Biotropica Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 740 - 747 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Association for Tropical Biology
01.11.2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Periodicals Inc Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Complex networks of species interactions might be determined by species traits but also by simple chance meetings governed by species abundances. Although the idea that species traits structure mutualistic networks is appealing, most studies have found abundance to be a major structuring mechanism underlying interaction frequencies. With a well‐resolved plant–hummingbird interaction network from the Neotropical savanna in Brazil, we asked whether species morphology, phenology, nectar availability and habitat occupancy and/or abundance best predicted the frequency of interactions. For this, we constructed interaction probability matrices and compared them to the observed plant‐hummingbird matrix through a likelihood approach. Furthermore, a recently proposed modularity algorithm for weighted bipartite networks was employed to evaluate whether these factors also scale‐up to the formation of modules in the network. Interaction frequencies were best predicted by species morphology, phenology and habitat occupancy, while species abundances and nectar availability performed poorly. The plant–hummingbird network was modular, and modules were associated to morphological specialization and habitat occupancy. Our findings highlight the importance of traits as determinants of interaction frequencies and network structure, corroborating the results of a previous study on a plant–hummingbird network from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Thus, we propose that traits matter more in tropical plant–hummingbird networks than in less specialized systems. To test the generality of this hypothesis, future research could employ geographic or taxonomic cross‐system comparisons contrasting networks with known differences in level of specialization. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.12170 Carlsberg Foundation TABLE S1. Total abundances of hummingbirds and plants according to habitat in Panga Ecological Station, Brazil. TABLE S2. Frequency of plant and hummingbird species in each one of the four modules. FIGURE S1. Rarefaction curve for plant-hummingbird pairwise interactions in relation to the number of visits recorded in the Panga Ecological Station, Brazil. FIGURE S2. AIC values of the four nectar probabilistic models (matrices), the benchmark NULL model and the observed interaction matrix (O) in relation to the interaction data. FIGURE S3. Phenology of plants and hummingbirds from November 1996 to November 1997 in Panga Ecological Station, Brazil. istex:43E8B871D4C4C136645F8DB337856A033208D2E1 CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) - No. 99999.012341/2013-04 ark:/67375/WNG-4J28T661-5 CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico) ArticleID:BTP12170 Danish National Research Foundation ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0006-3606 1744-7429 |
DOI: | 10.1111/btp.12170 |