Distinguishing Structural and Functional Restraints in Evolution in Order to Identify Interaction Sites

• Published in: Journal of molecular biology Vol. 342; no. 5; pp. 1487 - 1504
• Main Authors: Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi, Chen, Lan, Blundell, Tom L., Lovell, Simon C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2004
• Subjects: Algorithms; Animals; Biological Evolution; Conserved Sequence; environment-specific substitution tables; evolution; functional sites; Humans; Models, Molecular; Molecular Structure; Protein Conformation; protein function; Protein Interaction Mapping; Proteins - chemistry; Sequence Alignment - statistics & numerical data; Software; MDH; functional sites; LDH; IGF; protein function; environment-specific substitution tables; RMSD; evolution; pdb
• ISSN: 0022-2836; 1089-8638
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.022

Structural genomics projects are producing many three-dimensional structures of proteins that have been identified only from their gene sequences. It is therefore important to develop computational methods that will predict sites involved in productive intermolecular interactions that might give clues about functions. Techniques based on evolutionary conservation of amino acids have the advantage over physiochemical methods in that they are more general. However, the majority of techniques neither use all available structural and sequence information, nor are able to distinguish between evolutionary restraints that arise from the need to maintain structure and those that arise from function. Three methods to identify evolutionary restraints on protein sequence and structure are described here. The first identifies those residues that have a higher degree of conservation than expected: this is achieved by comparing for each amino acid position the sequence conservation observed in the homologous family of proteins with the degree of conservation predicted on the basis of amino acid type and local environment. The second uses information theory to identify those positions where environment-specific substitution tables make poor predictions of the overall amino acid substitution pattern. The third method identifies those residues that have highly conserved positions when three-dimensional structures of proteins in a homologous family are superposed. The scores derived from these methods are mapped onto the protein three-dimensional structures and contoured, allowing identification clusters of residues with strong evolutionary restraints that are sites of interaction in proteins involved in a variety of functions. Our method differs from other published techniques by making use of structural information to identify restraints that arise from the structure of the protein and differentiating these restraints from others that derive from intermolecular interactions that mediate functions in the whole organism.