Body condition scoring as a predictor of body fat in horses and ponies

Body condition scoring systems were originally developed to quantify flesh cover in food animals and are commonly used to evaluate body fat in Equidae. The relationship between concurrent estimates of body fat content (eTBF%, deuterium oxide dilution; range, 2.7–35.6%) and subjective appraisals of b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe veterinary journal (1997) Vol. 194; no. 2; pp. 173 - 178
Main Authors Dugdale, Alexandra H.A., Grove-White, Dai, Curtis, Gemma C., Harris, Patricia A., Argo, Caroline McG
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Body condition scoring systems were originally developed to quantify flesh cover in food animals and are commonly used to evaluate body fat in Equidae. The relationship between concurrent estimates of body fat content (eTBF%, deuterium oxide dilution; range, 2.7–35.6%) and subjective appraisals of body ‘fatness’ (body condition score, BCS; range, 1.25–9/9), was investigated in 77 mature horses and ponies. Univariate (UVM, r2=0.79) and multivariable (MVM, r2=0.86) linear regression models described the association, where BCS and eTBF% were explanatory and outcome variables, respectively. Other measures (age, sex, breed, body mass, ultrasound-generated subcutaneous and abdominal retroperitoneal fat depths, withers height, heart and belly circumferences) were considered as potential confounders but only height, belly circumference and retroperitoneal fat depth remained in the final MVM. The association between BCS and eTBF% was logarithmic. Appraisal of the transformed regression (UVM), actual eTBF% values and 95%CIs of the model forecast, suggested that the power of log-transformed BCS as a predictor of eTBF% decreased as BCS increased. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction of horses with an eTBF% of >20%, suggested that the UVM correctly classified 76% of horses using a ‘cut-off’ of BCS 6.83/9 (sensitivity, 82.5%; specificity, 70.8%). Negative values for eTBF% were obtained for two thin ponies which were excluded from analyses, and caution is advised in the application of deuterium dilution methodologies where perturbed tissue hydration could be predicted. The data suggest that BCS descriptors may warrant further consideration/refinement to establish more clinically-useful, sub-classifications for overweight/obese animals.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.024
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1090-0233
1532-2971
DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.03.024