Gastrointestinal cell injury and perceived symptoms after running the Boston Marathon

Gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances are a prevalent cause of marathon related complaints, and in extreme cases can promote life-threatening conditions such as exertional heat stroke. Our aim was to study intestinal cell injury [via intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP)] and perceived GI dist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 14; p. 1268306
Main Authors Kelly, Melani R., Emerson, Dawn M., McDermott, Brendon P., Atkins, Whitley C., Butts, Cory L., Laursen, R. Mark, Troyanos, Christopher, Duckett, Andrew, Siedlik, Jacob
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 16.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances are a prevalent cause of marathon related complaints, and in extreme cases can promote life-threatening conditions such as exertional heat stroke. Our aim was to study intestinal cell injury [via intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP)] and perceived GI distress symptoms among marathon runners. We also examined potential risk factors (e.g., inadequate sleep) that could exacerbate GI disturbances in healthy, trained endurance runners. This was a parallel mixed-methods study design. 2019 Boston Marathon participants were recruited via email and subjects completed surveys before the race describing demographics and training history. Participants completed a GI questionnaire to assess presence and severity of symptoms, a survey regarding risk factors (e.g., recent illness, medications) that could promote GI disturbances, and provided a urine sample at three time points (immediately pre-race, post-race, and 24-h post-race). Due to weather, blood samples were only collected immediately and 24-h post-race. A total of 40 runners (males: n = 19, age = 44.9 ± 10.8 years; females: n = 21, age = 44.8 ± 10.6 years) completed this study. I-FABP significantly decreased from post-race (3367.5 ± 2633.5 pg/mL) to 24-h post-race (1657.3 ± 950.7 pg/mL, t (39) = −4.228, p < .001, d = −.669). There was a significant difference in overall GI symptom scores across the three time points (F (2, 39) = 41.37, p < .001). The highest average score occurred post-race (.84 ± .68), compared to pre-race (.09 ± .12) and 24-h post-race (.44 ± .28). Post-race I-FABP (r = .31, p = .048) and post-race urine specific gravity (r = .33, p = .041) were significantly correlated with post-race GI symptom scores. Our study provides further support to the individualized nature of GI disturbances, with participants experiencing a wide range of risk factors that can influence the extent of GI damage and perceived symptoms during and after exercise.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Moisés Silva, University of Porto, Portugal
Reviewed by: Emidio Marques De Matos Neto, Federal University of Piauí, Brazil
Matthieu Clauss, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Norway
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2023.1268306