Estimation of field inhomogeneity map following magnitude-based ambiguity-resolved water-fat separation

Magnitude-based PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction) and R2∗ mapping with resolved water-fat ambiguity is extended to calculate field inhomogeneity (field map) using the phase images. The estimation is formulated in matrix form, resolving the field map in a least-squares sense. PDFF and R2∗ from magni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMagnetic resonance imaging Vol. 97; pp. 102 - 111
Main Authors Triay Bagur, Alexandre, McClymont, Darryl, Hutton, Chloe, Borghetto, Andrea, Gyngell, Michael L., Aljabar, Paul, Robson, Matthew D., Brady, Michael, Bulte, Daniel P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Magnitude-based PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction) and R2∗ mapping with resolved water-fat ambiguity is extended to calculate field inhomogeneity (field map) using the phase images. The estimation is formulated in matrix form, resolving the field map in a least-squares sense. PDFF and R2∗ from magnitude fitting may be updated using the estimated field maps. The limits of quantification of our voxel-independent implementation were assessed. Bland-Altman was used to compare PDFF and field maps from our method against a reference complex-based method on 152 UK Biobank subjects (1.5 T Siemens). A separate acquisition (3 T Siemens) presenting field inhomogeneities was also used. The proposed field mapping was accurate beyond double the complex-based limit range. High agreement was obtained between the proposed method and the reference in UK. Robust field mapping was observed at 3 T, for inhomogeneities over 400 Hz including rapid variation across edges. Field mapping following unambiguous magnitude-based water-fat separation was demonstrated in-vivo and showed potential at 3 T.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0730-725X
1873-5894
1873-5894
DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2023.01.002