Neurological monitoring in ECMO patients: current state of practice, challenges and lessons

• Published in: Acta neurologica Belgica Vol. 123; no. 2; pp. 341 - 350
• Main Authors: Aboul-Nour, Hassan, Jumah, Ammar, Abdulla, Hafsa, Sharma, Amreeta, Howell, Bradley, Jayaprakash, Namita, Gardner-Gray, Jayna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.04.2023
• Subjects: Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Cohort Studies; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages - etiology; Ischemic Stroke - etiology; Medicine/Public Health; Neurology; Neuroradiology; Neurosciences; Retrospective Studies; Review; Review Article; Seizures - etiology; ECMO; Neurologic Monitoring; ECLS; Neuromonitoring; Hemorrhagic stroke; Cerebrovascular accidents; Ischemic stroke
• ISSN: 0300-9009; 2240-2993
• DOI: 10.1007/s13760-023-02193-2

Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill patients serves as a management option for end-stage cardiorespiratory failure in medical and surgical conditions. Patients on ECMO are at a high risk of neurologic adverse events including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), acute ischemic stroke (AIS), seizures, diffuse cerebral edema, and hypoxic brain injury. Standard approaches to neurological monitoring for patients receiving ECMO support can be challenging for multiple reasons, including the severity of critical illness, deep sedation, and/or paralysis. This narrative literature review provides an overview of the current landscape for neurological monitoring in this population. Methods A literature search using PubMed was used to aid the understanding of the landscape of published literature in the area of neurological monitoring in ECMO patients. Results Review articles, cohort studies, case series, and individual reports were identified. A total of 73 varied manuscripts were summarized and included in this review which presents the challenges and strategies for performing neurological monitoring in this population. Conclusion Neurological monitoring in ECMO is an area of interest to many clinicians, however, the literature is limited, heterogenous, and lacks consensus on the best monitoring practices. The evidence for optimal neurological monitoring that could impact clinical decisions and functional outcomes is lacking. Additional studies are needed to identify effective measures of neurological monitoring while on ECMO.