TechCheck: Development and Validation of an Unplugged Assessment of Computational Thinking in Early Childhood Education
There is a need for developmentally appropriate Computational Thinking (CT) assessments that can be implemented in early childhood classrooms. We developed a new instrument called TechCheck for assessing CT skills in young children that does not require prior knowledge of computer programming. TechC...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of science education and technology Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 482 - 498 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01.08.2020
Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | There is a need for developmentally appropriate Computational Thinking (CT) assessments that can be implemented in early childhood classrooms. We developed a new instrument called
TechCheck
for assessing CT skills in young children that does not require prior knowledge of computer programming.
TechCheck
is based on developmentally appropriate CT concepts and uses a multiple-choice “unplugged” format that allows it to be administered to whole classes or online settings in under 15 min. This design allows assessment of a broad range of abilities and avoids conflating coding with CT skills. We validated the instrument in a cohort of 5–9-year-old students (
N
= 768) participating in a research study involving a robotics coding curriculum.
TechCheck
showed good reliability and validity according to measures of classical test theory and item response theory. Discrimination between skill levels was adequate. Difficulty was suitable for first graders and low for second graders. The instrument showed differences in performance related to race/ethnicity.
TechCheck
scores correlated moderately with a previously validated CT assessment tool (
TACTIC-KIBO
). Overall,
TechCheck
has good psychometric properties, is easy to administer and score, and discriminates between children of different CT abilities. Implications, limitations, and directions for future work are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1059-0145 1573-1839 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10956-020-09831-x |