Leg crossing, muscle tensing, squatting, and the crash position are effective against vasovagal reactions solely through increases in cardiac output
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center/ University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Submitted 5 November 2004 ; accepted in final form 27 June 2005 Tensing of lower body muscles without or with leg cro...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 99; no. 5; pp. 1697 - 1703 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bethesda, MD
Am Physiological Soc
01.11.2005
American Physiological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center/ University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Submitted 5 November 2004
; accepted in final form 27 June 2005
Tensing of lower body muscles without or with leg crossing (LBMT, LCMT), whole body tensing (WBT), squatting, and sitting with the head bent between the knees ("crash position," HBK) are believed to abort vasovagal reactions. The underlying mechanisms are unknown. To study these interventions in patients with a clinical history of vasovagal syncope and a vasovagal reaction during routine tilt table testing, we measured blood pressure (BP) continuously with Finapres and derived heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance using Modelflow. In series A ( n = 12) we compared LBMT to LCMT. In series B ( n = 9), WBT was compared with LCMT. In series C ( n = 14) and D ( n = 9), we tested squatting and HBK. All maneuvers caused an increase in BP, varying from a systolic rise from 77 ± 8 to 104 ± 18 mmHg ( P < 0.05) in series A during LBMT to a rise from 70 ± 10 to 123 ± 9 mmHg ( P < 0.05) in series B during LCMT. In each maneuver, the BP increase started within 35 s from start of the maneuver. In all maneuvers, there was an increase in CO varying from 54 ± 12% of baseline to 94 ± 21% in WBT to a rise from 65 ± 17% to 110 ± 22% in LCMT in series A . No maneuver caused significant change in total peripheral resistance. We conclude that the mechanism underlying the effects of these maneuvers is exclusively an increase in CO.
Modelflow; muscle pump; stroke volume
Address for correspondence: C. T. P. Krediet, Academic Medical Center/Univ. of Amsterdam, Dept. of Internal Medicine, F4-222, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: c.t.krediet{at}amc.nl ) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI: | 10.1152/japplphysiol.01250.2004 |