Defining digital coaching: a qualitative inductive approach

The term ‘digital coaching’ is widely used but ill-defined. The present study therefore investigates how digital coaching is defined and how it differentiates from face-to-face coaching and other digital-technology-enabled (DT-enabled) formats, such as digital training, digital mentoring, or digital...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 14; p. 1148243
Main Authors Diller, Sandra J., Passmore, Jonathan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 05.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The term ‘digital coaching’ is widely used but ill-defined. The present study therefore investigates how digital coaching is defined and how it differentiates from face-to-face coaching and other digital-technology-enabled (DT-enabled) formats, such as digital training, digital mentoring, or digital consulting. A qualitative inductive approach was chosen for more in-depth and open-minded content. Based on previous studies on the importance of asking coaches working in the field, 260 coaches working in the field of digital coaching were surveyed. The given answers depict the importance of differing between forms of DT-enabled coaching. Thus, digital coaching is a DT-enabled, synchronous conversation between a human coach and a human coachee, which is different to artificial intelligence (AI) coaching and coaching that is supported by asynchronous digital and learning communication technologies. Due to this definition and differentiation, future studies can explore the digital coaching process and its effectiveness – particularly in comparison to other formats. Furthermore, this clear definition enables practitioners to maintain professional standards and manage client’s expectations of digital coaching while helping clients understand what to expect from digital coaching.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID: Sandra J. Diller, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-7548
Jonathan Passmore, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-7510
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Edited by: Sewon Kim, The State University of New York (SUNY) Empire State College, United States
Reviewed by: Rob Poell, Tilburg University, Netherlands; Valerie Anderson, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148243